Perspectives on Activity Theory 1999
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511812774.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
486
0
86

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 651 publications
(576 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
486
0
86
Order By: Relevance
“…Guided by second and third generation cultural-historical activity theory -CHAT (Engeström, 1987(Engeström, , 1999(Engeström, , 2001), the study is in two phases and is presently ongoing (2014)(2015). Our research design emulates that of the WoTE studies in the UK and Australia (Ellis, Blake, McNicholl & McNally, 2011;Nuttall, Brennan, Zipin, Tuinamuana & Cameron, 2013).…”
Section: Accepted For Publication Version -Pre--proof and Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided by second and third generation cultural-historical activity theory -CHAT (Engeström, 1987(Engeström, , 1999(Engeström, , 2001), the study is in two phases and is presently ongoing (2014)(2015). Our research design emulates that of the WoTE studies in the UK and Australia (Ellis, Blake, McNicholl & McNally, 2011;Nuttall, Brennan, Zipin, Tuinamuana & Cameron, 2013).…”
Section: Accepted For Publication Version -Pre--proof and Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, a subject engages in an objectoriented, tool-mediated activity, but this happens within a community, which has certain rules and within which there is a division of labour (Engeström 1999). These six components together frame an activity system (see Fig.…”
Section: Introducing Cultural-historical Activity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Rogoff notes: "In attempting to take account of the social setting in which learning takes place, the basic unit of analysis is no longer (the properties of) the individual but the (processes of the) sociocultural activity" (1990, p. 14). Since much of activity theory has been developed in rendering an account of work-place cognition (e.g., Engeström, 1999Engeström, , 2001Engeström & Middleton, 1998;Zinchenko, 1985;Scribner, 1997), it seems natural to frame team-executed projects such as those in Innovate to Mitigate in similar terms. What is not typical is to use that framing to address the challenge of studying student learning in such a project, as we attempt here.…”
Section: Activity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engeström, 1999). By the time the ILF were fully engaged, the project's initial definition of their object and goals was beginning to recede in their minds, and they all began to think beyond this episode in their lives, to future investigations for which this was preparation or prototype.…”
Section: Coda: Object As Horizonmentioning
confidence: 99%