Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
In an unconsolidated environment, operators often employ frac-packs to stimulate the reservoir as well as to provide sand control. If the frac-pack is designed and applied correctly, the stimulation will not only increase the recovery of reserves and reduce drawdown, but the sand control will remain effective for a long period of time. With rig costs presently as high as $600 thousand or more per day, reducing workover needs is a major consideration in today's oilfield environment. This paper discusses the crucial design requirements for a frac-pack installation and why accurate reservoir data is critical to the effectiveness of both the pumping and completion aspects of the design. In the past, assumptions on reservoir information for the frac-pack were often based on historical data and conventional fracturing theories because relevant reservoir information was not available. Following these design parameters often provided inconsistent results that did not meet the intended goals, especially in deeper, higher-pressure environments. Moreover, since frac-pack has now become one of the most common methods used in sand-control completions, and development has moved into deeper, more complicated environments, it is even more critical that the essential tools and data required to meet the operator's goals be used in order to design the frac-pack completion. This paper will discuss the well parameters and other critical information that enables frac-pack completions to be designed to meet today's more critical reservoir, safety, and cost-efficiency needs. Introduction The use of frac-pack completions has increased in many areas of the world, and one of its main growth areas has been in deepwater development, which is now adjacent to several continents. Deepwater attracts operators that vary from majors to mid-size independents. Even with the high levels of investment essential for this type of development, the production possibilities make these developments very attractive. The operating costs in deepwater are extreme and require great care in planning and design of frac-pack completion installation. Certain data must be acquired if the following needs, which are critical to success, are to be met:Improved design efficiency and reliabilityOptimization of the stimulation treatment to improve well productivityPrediction of possible outcomes for the frac-pack treatmentReduction of job planning timeReduction of location time spent to redesign or resolve on-site problemsDevelopment of the most accurate models of what happens downhole. Although many of the technical and environmental issues regarding frac-pack completions remain the same between deepwater and non-deepwater applications, their implication is magnified in deepwater due to their typical size and cost; (Richardson et al, 2008). The ultimate objectives, which are to maximize well productivity and recovery through the initial completion, are the same and can only be obtained through completion and frac-pack reliability. A frac-pack provides two main benefits to an operator - stimulation and sand control. If the frac-pack is applied correctly, it can help to stimulate a well and allow for greater production with less drawdown as well as increased recovery of reserves. While these benefits can vary depending on the well conditions, in most cases, the frac-pack will enhance production, if the treatment is optimized. There are many factors and software programs that are used to determine how greatly the treatment can affect the formation. At a minimum, the fracture will bypass near-wellbore damage, and thus, bringing the formation closer to its original skin values.
In an unconsolidated environment, operators often employ frac-packs to stimulate the reservoir as well as to provide sand control. If the frac-pack is designed and applied correctly, the stimulation will not only increase the recovery of reserves and reduce drawdown, but the sand control will remain effective for a long period of time. With rig costs presently as high as $600 thousand or more per day, reducing workover needs is a major consideration in today's oilfield environment. This paper discusses the crucial design requirements for a frac-pack installation and why accurate reservoir data is critical to the effectiveness of both the pumping and completion aspects of the design. In the past, assumptions on reservoir information for the frac-pack were often based on historical data and conventional fracturing theories because relevant reservoir information was not available. Following these design parameters often provided inconsistent results that did not meet the intended goals, especially in deeper, higher-pressure environments. Moreover, since frac-pack has now become one of the most common methods used in sand-control completions, and development has moved into deeper, more complicated environments, it is even more critical that the essential tools and data required to meet the operator's goals be used in order to design the frac-pack completion. This paper will discuss the well parameters and other critical information that enables frac-pack completions to be designed to meet today's more critical reservoir, safety, and cost-efficiency needs. Introduction The use of frac-pack completions has increased in many areas of the world, and one of its main growth areas has been in deepwater development, which is now adjacent to several continents. Deepwater attracts operators that vary from majors to mid-size independents. Even with the high levels of investment essential for this type of development, the production possibilities make these developments very attractive. The operating costs in deepwater are extreme and require great care in planning and design of frac-pack completion installation. Certain data must be acquired if the following needs, which are critical to success, are to be met:Improved design efficiency and reliabilityOptimization of the stimulation treatment to improve well productivityPrediction of possible outcomes for the frac-pack treatmentReduction of job planning timeReduction of location time spent to redesign or resolve on-site problemsDevelopment of the most accurate models of what happens downhole. Although many of the technical and environmental issues regarding frac-pack completions remain the same between deepwater and non-deepwater applications, their implication is magnified in deepwater due to their typical size and cost; (Richardson et al, 2008). The ultimate objectives, which are to maximize well productivity and recovery through the initial completion, are the same and can only be obtained through completion and frac-pack reliability. A frac-pack provides two main benefits to an operator - stimulation and sand control. If the frac-pack is applied correctly, it can help to stimulate a well and allow for greater production with less drawdown as well as increased recovery of reserves. While these benefits can vary depending on the well conditions, in most cases, the frac-pack will enhance production, if the treatment is optimized. There are many factors and software programs that are used to determine how greatly the treatment can affect the formation. At a minimum, the fracture will bypass near-wellbore damage, and thus, bringing the formation closer to its original skin values.
The Ursa-Princess Waterflood (UPWF) targets the Lower Yellow sand, the main reservoir in the Mars-Ursa basin in Mississippi Canyon, about 60 miles south of the mouth of the Mississippi river in the Gulf of Mexico, USA. The Lower Yellow sand, a world class Upper Miocene turbidite reservoir, has been on production in the Ursa and Princess fields since 1999, and has been drawn down nearly to the bubble point. The waterflood is intended to increase and stabilize reservoir pressure, and to improve sweep efficiency. To accomplish this, four subsea injectors were designed and constructed to inject treated seawater at some 40,000 bbl/day each for a target life of 30 years.As the Lower Yellow reservoir was already highly depleted, unique risks were identified in the planned subsea completion operations, to be conducted from a Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU). Seawater, used as a completion fluid, was expected to be up to 4000 psi overbalanced to the reservoir, depending on the well location. This created the risk of either uncontrollable fluid level drop in the marine riser or extreme impairment to the sandface completion. In order to maintain well control with a fluid level at the surface and still deliver low skin completions, multiple design and procedural issues needed to be addressed, including:1. Control systems on the rig and riser system to prevent uncontrollable fluid level drop, 2.Perforating systems to minimize impairment in a high overbalance environment without adding undue risk to well control, 3.Pill designs that could both control fluid loss at the sand face and clean up effectively, 4.Downhole completion systems capable of functioning either under very high pressure differentials or against very high loss rates, 5.Development of high burst screens that could withstand pilling in the event mechanical fluid loss devices failed. As more Deepwater reservoirs approach depletion, specialized tools and procedures will be required to continue to deliver safe and effective sandface completions from floating rigs. This paper details many of these considerations, and summarizes the execution experience and results for one such reservoir.
Summary The Ursa-Princess Waterflood (UPWF) targets the Lower Yellow sand, the main reservoir in the Mars-Ursa basin in Mississippi Canyon, approximately 60 miles south of the mouth of the Mississippi River in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM). The Lower Yellow sand, a world-class Upper Miocene turbidite reservoir, has been on production in the Ursa and Princess fields since 1999, and has been drawn down nearly to the bubblepoint. The waterflood is intended to increase and stabilize reservoir pressure, and to improve sweep efficiency. To accomplish this, four subsea injectors were designed and constructed to inject treated seawater at 40,000 B/D each for a target life of 30 years. Because the Lower Yellow reservoir was already highly depleted, unique risks were identified in the planned subsea completion operations, to be conducted from a mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU). Seawater, used as a completion fluid, was expected to be up to 4,000 psi overbalanced to the reservoir, depending on the well location. This created the risk of either an uncontrollable fluid-level drop in the marine riser or an extreme impairment to the sandface completion. In order to maintain well control with a fluid level at the surface and still deliver low-skin completions, multiple design and procedural issues needed to be addressed, including the following: Control systems on the rig and riser system to prevent uncontrollable fluid-level drop. Perforating systems to minimize impairment in a highly overbalanced environment without adding undue risk to well control. Pill designs that could both control fluid loss at the sandface and clean up effectively. Downhole completion systems capable of functioning either under very high pressure differentials or against very high loss rates. Development of high-burst screens suited to the use of fluid-loss-control pills as a contingency provision in the event that mechanical fluid-loss devices failed. As more deepwater reservoirs approach depletion, specialized tools and procedures will be required to continue to deliver safe and effective sandface completions from floating rigs. This paper details many of these considerations and summarizes the execution experience and results for one such reservoir.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with đź’™ for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.