Innovative outcomes in public-private innovation partnerships: a systematic review of empirical evidence and current challenges

Brogaard, Lena

doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1668473

Cited by 44 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The apparent lack of significance of the vertical networks in this study may lie in the fact that while the interaction needed to develop innovative public products or services is quite intense (see e.g. Brogaard, 2021), the regular public sector purchasing is often characterised by the arm’s length interaction between public sector customers and suppliers.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

The importance of SMEs’ network partners in consortium bidding for public sector tenders

Reijonen

Saastamoinen

Tammi

2021

IJPSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe aim is to examine the importance small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) see in different network partners regarding successful tendering in public procurement, and whether this perception predicts the number of joint bids and wins.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected by an electronic questionnaire which was sent to the registered users of the leading electronic platform for public procurement in Finland. The data were analysed with statistical methods.FindingsThe findings suggest that a favourable perception of the importance of horizontal networks in public procurement is associated with a larger number of joint bids and better success in joint bidding. However, the results do not establish a positive correlation between vertical networks and consortium bidding.Research limitations/implicationsThe data were collected from a single EU country. Since the criteria for bidding consortia may vary between countries, different results might have been achieved from other countries.Practical implicationsSMEs should be encouraged to form bidding consortia and acquire related experience. Policymakers should minimise barriers to consortium bidding, e.g. by offering more information. They should also assess the merits of joint bidding because they rarely encourage SMEs to bid as a consortium.Social implicationsConsortium bidding is a way of enhancing SMEs’ possibilities to participate in public tender contests, even in large contracts.Originality/valueWhile consortium bidding has been recognised to enhance SMEs’ possibilities of participating in public procurement, there is limited research into how SMEs’ network collaborations relate to bidding as a consortium.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

The importance of SMEs’ network partners in consortium bidding for public sector tenders

Reijonen

Saastamoinen

Tammi

2021

IJPSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to understand the readiness assessment for PPPs, the interviewees were asked questions around the timing and preparation for adoption of strategies, undertaking of feasibility studies, usage of PPP frameworks, utilization of experts in the assessment process, capacity building through training of key personnel and selection process of private partners. The ultimate objective of this was to ascertain whether the innovation (PPPs) facilitated the learning (Brogaard, 2019). As illustrated in Table 3, this process is underpinned by Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory (Rogers, 2003, 2004) and associated stages of awareness, decision to adopt (or reject) and initial usage and the first three stages of knowledge, persuasion and decision as illustrated and defined in Table 2.…”

Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Readiness assessment of public–private partnerships (PPPs) adoption in developing countries: the case of Tanzania

Chileshe

Kavishe

2020

BEPAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the Tanzanian practitioner’s readiness assessment for public–private partnership (PPP) adoption. This study is important as the readiness assessment enables the stakeholders to assess their capability and current status quo to implement new ideas such as PPPs.Design/methodology/approachUnderpinned by the theoretical lenses of innovation diffusion theory (IDT), this research undertakes semi-structured interviews with PPP practitioners within the Tanzanian affordable housing sector. The content analysis was used for the data as collected.Findings“Lack of awareness and usage of PPPs framework models during the feasibility and subsequent implementation process”, “Limited knowledge and skills required for PPP practitioners”, “Poor capacity building”, “Lack of engagement of experts during the viability and assessment process” and “Poor selection process of private partners giving rising to unsolicited proposals” are the main PPP features influencing the readiness process and fostering of innovation.Practical implicationsThe identification of the readiness approaches would support PPP policymakers and stakeholders with the government mechanisms for identifying the key areas needed to be addressed to improve the PPP implementation performance.Originality/valueOutputs of this study provide insights on how to foster a better understanding of the readiness assessment strategies and approaches for successfully implementing PPP in affordable housing projects.

show abstract

“…PPPs for innovation are less common and became apparent only recently and mostly in the management literature (Brogaard, 2019). Brogaard (2019) identifies several factors influencing innovation taking into account the interaction of involved actors and their ability to drive the innovation process forward but is not considering specifically the drivers or motivation for the actors and how such partnerships evolve in the first step. Further studies analyze the impact of innovation training on the outcome of a PPP (Brogaard, 2016) or specific characteristics of infrastructure PPPs that can foster innovation such as “design freedom, collaborative working, risk transfer and long‐term commitment” (Carbonara & Pellegrino, 2020, p. 3).…”

Section: Development Of Public‐private Partnershipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The research question “are actors of PPPs for innovation motivated due to financial incentives or can they be policy driven?” is, therefore, particularly relevant for practitioners, researchers, and policy‐makers and confronts three gaps in the PPP literature. First, the current literature focuses mainly on infrastructure projects and public services, whereas, public‐private innovation partnerships became apparent only recently (Brogaard, 2019). Secondly, the role of social actors in PPP implementation is largely ignored (Biygautane et al, 2019) and, thirdly, the main motivation behind PPP projects are claimed to be financially driven, such as lower costs and risks because of shared responsibilities (Wang et al, 2017; Willems & van Dooren, 2014).…”

Section: Development Of Public‐private Partnershipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

One for the money, two for the show: What are the actor‐based incentives for public‐private partnerships for innovation?

Ilgenstein

2021

European Policy Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to identify the processes that lead to the establishment of public-private partnerships (PPPs) with a focus on the financial and policy incentives of the actors involved. To this end, it applies the Multiple Streams Framework to a qualitative case study to answer the following research question: are actors of PPPs for innovation motivated due to financial incentives or can they be policy driven? Although the fiscal context plays an important role in our case, the study shows that policy goals, such as providing infrastructure or public services and promoting innovation can be the main drivers for establishing a PPP.These findings offer a theoretical and practical contribution to analyze PPPs as a phenomenon. First, we establish a theoretical framework of possible incentives for actors in PPPs and, secondly, provide new insights into the PPP discussion in the public administration literature. K E Y W O R D Sinnovation, public-private partnership | INTRODUCTIONThis paper aims to identify the processes that lead to the establishment of public-private partnerships (PPP) with a focus on the preferences of the involved actors. More specifically, we analyze financial

show abstract

Innovative outcomes in public-private innovation partnerships: a systematic review of empirical evidence and current challenges

Cited by 44 publications

References 61 publications

The importance of SMEs’ network partners in consortium bidding for public sector tenders

The importance of SMEs’ network partners in consortium bidding for public sector tenders

Readiness assessment of public–private partnerships (PPPs) adoption in developing countries: the case of Tanzania

One for the money, two for the show: What are the actor‐based incentives for public‐private partnerships for innovation?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About