lines. While windrowed harvest residues have been shown to be effective barriers against erosion, little is Information on decomposition of harvest residues may assist in known about their decomposition kinetics and how this the maintenance of soil fertility in second rotation (2R) hoop pine plantations (Araucaria cunninghamii Aiton ex A. Cunn.) of subtropi-affects nutrient conditions in following rotations. Succal Australia. The experiment was undertaken to determine the dy-cessful plantation management strategies require denamics of residue decomposition and fate of residue-derived N. We tailed knowledge of the residue decomposition process used 15 N-labeled hoop pine foliage, branch, and stem material in and the fate of the nutrients subsequently released (Vanmicroplots, over a 30-mo period following harvesting. We examined lauwe et al., 1997). In hoop pine plantations, litterfall the decomposition of each component both singly and combined, and occurs within a closed system and forms a reasonably used 13 C cross-polarization and magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic constant part of the renewal process with a soil faunal resonance (13 C CPMAS NMR) to chart C transformations in decomand microbial community that is adapted to, and preposing foliage. Residue-derived 15 N was immobilized in the 0-to 5-cm pared for, litter utilization. Conversely, harvest residues soil layer, with approximately 40% 15 N recovery in the soil from the form a massive influx to a highly disturbed system where combined residues by the end of the 30-mo period. Total recovery of 15 N in residues and soil varied between 60 and 80% for the combined-the temperature and moisture regimes have been radiresidue microplots, with 20 to 40% of the residue 15 N apparently lost.