2018
DOI: 10.7341/20181412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovativeness of Enterprises in Poland in the Regional Context

Abstract: The article examines the innovativeness of enterprises in 69 Polish NUTS3 sub-regions in 2014. The analysis is based on unpublished regional data from the Polish Central Statistical Office covering the following variables: the share of enterprises which have incurred outlays for innovative activities, the share of enterprises implementing process or product innovations, the share of companies collaborating in the field of innovation, and the share of new or modernized products in total production sold in indus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, the obtained results confirm the conclusions from other studies devoted to the analysis of determinants of firm-level innovativeness of Polish enterprises (Arendt & Grabowski, 2017Szczygielski & Grabowski, 2014;Szczygielski et al, 2017;Lewandowska & Kowalski, 2015;Lewandowska, 2016). Moreover, the results are consistent with the conclusions from studies devoted to regional differences in innovativeness (Golejewska, 2018). It should be stressed that the conclusions from this paper significantly expand the existing knowledge concerning firm-level and regional-level determinants of innovativeness.…”
Section: Journal Of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation (Jemi)supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In most cases, the obtained results confirm the conclusions from other studies devoted to the analysis of determinants of firm-level innovativeness of Polish enterprises (Arendt & Grabowski, 2017Szczygielski & Grabowski, 2014;Szczygielski et al, 2017;Lewandowska & Kowalski, 2015;Lewandowska, 2016). Moreover, the results are consistent with the conclusions from studies devoted to regional differences in innovativeness (Golejewska, 2018). It should be stressed that the conclusions from this paper significantly expand the existing knowledge concerning firm-level and regional-level determinants of innovativeness.…”
Section: Journal Of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation (Jemi)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Though regional factors are important in explaining the innovativeness of enterprises (Sternberg & Arndt, 2001;Golejewska, 2018), not much attention…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the research discovered the occurrence of unsatisfactory cooperation between enterprises in the area of innovation. This suggests the existence of distrust between firms as regards innovation activity, which may result in the lack of mutual benefits from the implementation of innovations (Golejewska, 2018). Similar conclusions can be derived from the Norwegian experience.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Gartner, 1990;Shane & Venkataraman, 2000). Scholars focus on entrepreneur-and venture-level characteristics, such as alertness to new opportunities and bricolage activities (Roundy, Harrison, Khavul, Pérez-Nordtvedt, & 2017;Zollo, Rialti, Ciappei, & Boccardi, 2018) and, recently, on the system-level forces that support and promote regional entrepreneurial activities (Golejewska, 2018;Nicotra, Romano, Del Giudice, & Schillaci, 2018). Across these levels of analysis, scholars are devoting growing attention to how entrepreneurs construct, convey, and interpret their actions through language because of its central role in the entrepreneurship process (e.g., Clarke & Cornelissen, 2014;Roundy, 2016).…”
Section: The Power Of Language In Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%