“…The device was cost-effective, reusable, and had an exceptionally higher power conversion efficiency of 7.9%. After that, huge advancements have been achieved in this field, and to the best of our knowledge, a maximum photoconversion efficiency of around 30% was achieved. − Moreover, for commercial application the device should cross the threshold limit of operation of 20 years under outdoor conduction with a minimum of 10% cell efficiency . However, this liquid electrolyte-based DSSC still possesses several problems, including solvent evaporation, volatilization, easy leakage and flammability, which limit its long time practical outdoor application. , To find an alternative to liquid electrolytes, there is rising interest in using polymer-based solid-state electrolytes. ,− Currently, a flexible gel polymer electrolyte-based solid-state DSSC (ssDSSC) has been reported with an efficiency of 7% using 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis[N,N-di(4-methoxyphenyl)amino]-9,9′-spirobifluorene (spiro-MeOTAD), an efficient hole-transport material (HTM), and that efficiency was lately improved to 12.3% by Hardin et al However, overall cell efficiencies of ssDSSCs are not good enough for practical application.…”