1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-68046-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inorganic Stereochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
160
1
4

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
160
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…At first glance, the fact that the Ln III centers in the isomorphous complexes 1·2MeOH, 2·2MeOH and 4·2MeOH have different coordination geometries (and not consistent CShM values) seems strange. We attribute this to two factors: (i) For a given ligand set of nine donor atoms, the tricapped trigonal prism, capped square antiprism and capped cube polyhedra have comparable energies [48,49] and there exist minimal distortion interconversion paths between them; thus many structures are intermediate between two ideal shapes [48], and (ii) the Ln III -donor atom distances are slightly different due to lanthanide(III) contraction and this can affect the shape. For example, the CShM values of the Dy III center in 4·2MeOH for the spherical capped square antiprism (3.263), spherical-relaxed capped cube (4.016) and tricapped trigonal prism (4.165) are all low and similar (Table S1), and its polyhedron could be equally well described as spherical-relaxed capped cube (a polyhedron that gives the lowest CShM value for the Pr III center in 1·2MeOH, Table S3).…”
Section: Interatomic Distances (å) Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first glance, the fact that the Ln III centers in the isomorphous complexes 1·2MeOH, 2·2MeOH and 4·2MeOH have different coordination geometries (and not consistent CShM values) seems strange. We attribute this to two factors: (i) For a given ligand set of nine donor atoms, the tricapped trigonal prism, capped square antiprism and capped cube polyhedra have comparable energies [48,49] and there exist minimal distortion interconversion paths between them; thus many structures are intermediate between two ideal shapes [48], and (ii) the Ln III -donor atom distances are slightly different due to lanthanide(III) contraction and this can affect the shape. For example, the CShM values of the Dy III center in 4·2MeOH for the spherical capped square antiprism (3.263), spherical-relaxed capped cube (4.016) and tricapped trigonal prism (4.165) are all low and similar (Table S1), and its polyhedron could be equally well described as spherical-relaxed capped cube (a polyhedron that gives the lowest CShM value for the Pr III center in 1·2MeOH, Table S3).…”
Section: Interatomic Distances (å) Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basal pinacoid face of the square pyramid forms together with two sulphur atoms Table 2. Geometric conditions for an ideal single-capped trigonal prism [31]. Five different edges with index i have to be distinguished occurring with frequency ni and different edge lengths di.…”
Section: Compression Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First we look for the best-fitting MSA or TTP for a given structure (MD snapshot) by applying the symmetry operations of the point group to all donor atoms and estimating a quality factor related to the root mean square displacements [25]. In order to confirm our symmetry assignment, we calculate the angles defined by Kepert [35] (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Coordination Polyhedron Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%