1991
DOI: 10.1002/bies.950130810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inositol tetrakisphosphate as a second messenger: Confusions, contradictions, and a potential resolution

Abstract: The second messenger function of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) is now well-defined--it mobilizes Ca2+ from intracellular stores so that cystolic Ca2+ increases. However, the function of inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (InsP4) has proved much more difficult to fathom, as it has been reported to exert a wide variety of effects in a collection of experimental systems. In this review, a proposed molecular mechanism for InsP4's actions is discussed; it is suggested that InsP4 is the second messenger that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
85
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has for a long time been evident that mouse lacrimal acinar cells, specifically when freshly isolated, are something of a ' freak ' preparation in which the effects of InsP % are so pronounced as to be clearly obvious. Furthermore, it is also clear that this is not the case in most other experimental systems [1,2]. However, the clear isomeric specificity of the requirement for InsP % [4] has always argued [28] for this being a quantitative rather than a qualitative artefact ; in short, an exaggeration of a physiological event rather than a creation of an entirely new one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It has for a long time been evident that mouse lacrimal acinar cells, specifically when freshly isolated, are something of a ' freak ' preparation in which the effects of InsP % are so pronounced as to be clearly obvious. Furthermore, it is also clear that this is not the case in most other experimental systems [1,2]. However, the clear isomeric specificity of the requirement for InsP % [4] has always argued [28] for this being a quantitative rather than a qualitative artefact ; in short, an exaggeration of a physiological event rather than a creation of an entirely new one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…% has had a long and chequered history as an intracellular second messenger [1,2] surrounded by controversy fuelled by confusing and contradictory results. Overall, InsP % has been shown to influence the kinetics of Ca# + release from stores and Ca# + entry stimulated by InsP $ .…”
Section: Inspmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considerable controversy exists as to whether Ins(1,3,4,5)P, possesses an independent or accessory second messenger role. Some evidence suggests that Ins (l,3,4,5)P~ may modulate in calcium entry across the plasma membrane (reviewed [4][5][6]), indeed Ins( 1,3,4,5)P,-activated Ca2' channels have been recently identified in the plasma membrane of endothelial cells [7] and Ins(1,3,4,5)P,-activated Ca2+ mobilisation has been observed using crude microsomes and enriched vesicular plasma membranes prepared from T-lymphocyte and monocyte cell lines [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%