2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-019-09996-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input and output of nutrients and energy in urban and peri-urban livestock holdings of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the sites in Diourbel-Louga, Senegal, Centre-Centre Sud in Burkina Faso, and Niger State in Nigeria, with very high livestock density (see Table 2), the BLR model predicted a negative impact of livestock density, especially cattle, on the presence of natural vegetation (see Tables 3 and 5 and Figure 6(b1,b2) for graphical representations of the cases in Diourbel-Louga, Senegal and Niger State, Nigeria). In reality, grazing and trampling pressure by livestock have negative impacts on total above ground biomass with pressure, increasing when livestock density increases [58,[86][87][88]. This is consistent with the findings from this study.…”
Section: Livestock Densitysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the sites in Diourbel-Louga, Senegal, Centre-Centre Sud in Burkina Faso, and Niger State in Nigeria, with very high livestock density (see Table 2), the BLR model predicted a negative impact of livestock density, especially cattle, on the presence of natural vegetation (see Tables 3 and 5 and Figure 6(b1,b2) for graphical representations of the cases in Diourbel-Louga, Senegal and Niger State, Nigeria). In reality, grazing and trampling pressure by livestock have negative impacts on total above ground biomass with pressure, increasing when livestock density increases [58,[86][87][88]. This is consistent with the findings from this study.…”
Section: Livestock Densitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…According to Schlecht et al [88], in highly populated and urbanized areas, livestock farmers dispose livestock dung in open spaces and streets. The exposure of dung to extreme sunlight and rainfall has negative implications on the environment since the process may lead to leaching of nutrients and emission of greenhouse gases, such as methane to the atmosphere with a subsequent impact on climate.…”
Section: Livestock Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This will increase the demand for food and in particular livestock products [49], given that the per capita meat consumption of urban dwellers is also increasing as the middle class grows in Sub- The populations of cattle, sheep, and goats in Bamako have been estimated at 35,000, 58,000, and 36,000, respectively [35], which corresponds to a population of 33,900 ruminants of 250 kg body weight (Tropical Livestock Unit, TLU). With a yearly feed intake of 482 kg DM (dry matter) for an average sheep, 396 kg DM for a goat and 2156 kg for a cattle [46], it can be assumed that about 66,920 t of feed DM are required annually for the ruminant livestock herd in Bamako. Currently, the city loses surrounding grassland at a rate of about 2.6% per year while its urban area is expanding at 5.4% [47], mainly towards the Kabala axis, which is also one of the biggest zones of fodder production (Figure 6).…”
Section: Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the city loses surrounding grassland at a rate of about 2.6% per year while its urban area is expanding at 5.4% [47], mainly towards the Kabala axis, which is also one of the biggest zones of fodder production (Figure 6). Where grassland is not converted into an urban built-up area, the transport of feeds into the city will lead to nutrient depletion of the feed-supplying rural hinterlands if the nutrients are not returned in the form of livestock manure [46].…”
Section: Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%