Input cost, capacity utilization and substitution in the short run

Abstract

Abstract. This article studies the behavior of input cost shares in an environment where labor is costly to adjust, materials can be adjusted at no cost and capital is fixed. A model relating cost shares with relative prices and adjustment costs is proposed, allowing joint estimation of the elasticity of substitution and the adjustment cost function, which is an unknown function of the capacity utilization. Based on a panel of more than 700 manufacturing firms, we find evidence of strong input share variations according to the degree of capacity utilization. The estimated shapes of adjustment costs curves of labor are in agreement with our theoretical model, and we obtain sensible elasticities of substitution estimates. Based on such estimates, we find evidence of a negative (positive) bias in downturns (recoveries) in conventional productivity growth measures. JEL classification: D24, E32

Analysis of the Physical Capacity Utilization in the Sugar Industry in Nigeria

“…It further indicates that the industry could increase physical capacity utilization rate if the rate of increase in output is greater than the rate of increase in the workforce of the industry. The result corroborates the findings of [31].…”

“…Delgado et al [31], carried out empirical study on the relationship among capacity utilization rate, capital investment, input prices and labor productivity in U.S.A. He used industry data on capital, labor, energy and material for 54 industries.…”

Firms' age, process innovation and productivity growth

“…We will specify it as a linear function of control variables. In particular, the empirical exercise performed here includes the variations in the firms' capacity utilisation (see Delgado et al, 1998), dummy variables to account for some sources of discrete changes in firms' efficiency levels (mergers, acquisitions, scissions) and time dummies as a way to pick up the influence of ''macroeconomic'' factors common to all firms (e.g., manufacturing cycle). In addition, the presumably high heterogeneity among activities makes it convenient to include sets of activity and firms' size dummies in order to control for any systematic differences in productivity growth.…”

Entry, exit and productivity growth: Spanish manufacturing during the eighties

“…In turn, x jt is a vector of productivity growth determinants including two very different types of variables: the micro 7 See, however, Delgado et al (1999) for a more structural approach to the problem. 8 The effects of the absence of linear homogeneity here are likely to be of second order (Appendix A).…”