2019
DOI: 10.1177/0142331219841113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input dependent Nyquist plot for limit cycle prediction and its suppression using fractional order controllers

Abstract: In practical systems having separable hard nonlinearities, sustained oscillation is detected at the steady state response due to the presence of stable limit cycles. An optimization problem is proposed to tune the fractional order controller parameters for system with multiple-nonlinearity to suppress the limit cycle magnitude in addition to meet the desired closed loop specifications. To extend the applicability of the existing Nyquist plot for predicting this limit cycle, an input dependent Nyquist plot is p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) FO-PID controller for magnetic levitation system providing better performance in terms of IAE, ISE, ITAE and control effort compared to integer order PID controller, 24 (ii) FO-PI/FO-PD controllers providing better suppression of limit cycle over conventional PID controller for servo plant with separable non-linearity, [25][26][27] (iii) unified controller parameter expressions of FO controllers are derived for universal plant having complex coefficient plus fractional complex order derivative with dead time to meet desired frequency domain specifications, 28 (iv) FO adaptive controller gives better performance in terms of control effort than classical controllers for variable time delay process system, 29 (v) FO-PI along with conventional feedforward controller design using classical frequency domain approach for level control system provide better performance than conventional controllers along with feedforward controller in terms of settling time, overshoot and level tracking, 30 (vi) FO-Sliding Mode Controller (SMC) provides better performance characteristics like finite time convergence and reduced chattering effect in the presence of parameter uncertainties compared to conventional SMC 31 and (vii) dual mode adaptive FO-PI with feedforward controller resulting better performance than decentralised PI, Quantitative Feedback Therory (QFT) and SMC controller in terms of settling time, overshoot and ISE. 10 On the other hand, controller parameters are tuned using various meta-heuristic algorithms by formulating objective function with constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) FO-PID controller for magnetic levitation system providing better performance in terms of IAE, ISE, ITAE and control effort compared to integer order PID controller, 24 (ii) FO-PI/FO-PD controllers providing better suppression of limit cycle over conventional PID controller for servo plant with separable non-linearity, [25][26][27] (iii) unified controller parameter expressions of FO controllers are derived for universal plant having complex coefficient plus fractional complex order derivative with dead time to meet desired frequency domain specifications, 28 (iv) FO adaptive controller gives better performance in terms of control effort than classical controllers for variable time delay process system, 29 (v) FO-PI along with conventional feedforward controller design using classical frequency domain approach for level control system provide better performance than conventional controllers along with feedforward controller in terms of settling time, overshoot and level tracking, 30 (vi) FO-Sliding Mode Controller (SMC) provides better performance characteristics like finite time convergence and reduced chattering effect in the presence of parameter uncertainties compared to conventional SMC 31 and (vii) dual mode adaptive FO-PI with feedforward controller resulting better performance than decentralised PI, Quantitative Feedback Therory (QFT) and SMC controller in terms of settling time, overshoot and ISE. 10 On the other hand, controller parameters are tuned using various meta-heuristic algorithms by formulating objective function with constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%