Host factors of influenza virus replication are often found in key topological positions within protein-protein interaction networks. This work explores how protein states can be manipulated through controllability analysis: the determination of the minimum manipulation needed to drive the cell system to any desired state. Here, we complete a two-part controllability analysis of two protein networks: a host network representing the healthy cell state and an influenza A virus-host network representing the infected cell state. This knowledge can be utilized to understand disease dynamics and isolate proteins for study as drug target candidates. Both topological and controllability analyses provide evidence of wide-reaching network effects stemming from the addition of viral-host protein interactions. Virus interacting and driver host proteins are significant both topologically and in controllability, therefore playing important roles in cell behavior during infection. 24 proteins are identified as holding regulatory roles specific to the infected cell by measures of topology, controllability, and functional role. These proteins are recommended for further study as potential antiviral drug targets. Importance: Seasonal outbreaks of influenza A virus are a major cause of illness and death around the world each year, with a constant threat of pandemic infection. Even so, the FDA has only approved four treatments, two of which are unsuited for at risk groups such as children and those with breathing complications. This research aims to increase the efficiency of antiviral drug target discovery using existing protein-protein interaction data and network analysis methods. Controllability analyses identify key regulating host factors of the infected cell's progression, findings which are supported by biological context. These results are beneficial to future studies of influenza virus, both experimental and computational. calculations: identifying the network components which must be manipulated for the system to be fully controlled (analogous to determining the non-zero elements of the matrix in classic controllability). Without manipulation, driver nodes will remain unaffected by changes to the rest of the system, rendering the total system uncontrollable. A set of driver nodes (size 6 ) that is capable of controlling the total network is called a minimum input set (MIS). The MIS is not unique and the number of possible MISs scales exponentially with the size of the network 33 . After a primary MIS is calculated, two methods of controllability node classification can be used.In the first method by Liu et al. 34 , the MIS is re-calculated (size 6 ′) after removing each node from the network. The node is then classified by its effect on the manipulation required to control the network, where an increase in the size of the MIS makes it more difficult to control the network and a decrease in the size of the MIS makes it easier to control the network. The absence of: an indispensable node increases the number of driver nodes...