Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0115594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input-output functions of mammalian motoneurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
267
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 370 publications
18
267
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased monoaminergic input to motoneurons originating from the metabotropic outputs of the raphe nucleus (Alvarez et al 1998) and locus coeruleus nucleus (Giroux et al 1999) is known to result in increased spinal motoneuronal excitability (Heckman et al 2003). In addition to the neuromodulatory influences on motoneurons, primary descending input for volitional movement is likely through an ionotropic mechanism (Powers and Binder 2001). Descending pontomedullary reticular formation output to the limbs is shown primarily to be from shoulder abductors and elbow flexors (Davidson and Buford 2004) and contribute to the bilateral control of reaching movements in the cat (Schepens and Drew 2004) and monkey (Davidson and Buford 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased monoaminergic input to motoneurons originating from the metabotropic outputs of the raphe nucleus (Alvarez et al 1998) and locus coeruleus nucleus (Giroux et al 1999) is known to result in increased spinal motoneuronal excitability (Heckman et al 2003). In addition to the neuromodulatory influences on motoneurons, primary descending input for volitional movement is likely through an ionotropic mechanism (Powers and Binder 2001). Descending pontomedullary reticular formation output to the limbs is shown primarily to be from shoulder abductors and elbow flexors (Davidson and Buford 2004) and contribute to the bilateral control of reaching movements in the cat (Schepens and Drew 2004) and monkey (Davidson and Buford 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article begins with a review of Eccles' contributions to our early understanding of motoneuron physiology, moves on to early studies in repetitive firing behavior by Ragnar Granit (1900-1991, Daniel Kernell, and their colleagues, and then addresses our current understanding of motoneuronal activity during behavior. My intent is not to provide a comprehensive review of motoneuron physiology, which can be found elsewhere (e.g., Rekling et al, 2000;Powers and Binder, 2001). Nor is this article a thorough historical analysis of Eccles' contributions (for such references, see Curtis and Andersen, 2001;Stuart and Pierce, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neuroinflammation response is a promising approach (Philips and Robberecht, 2011); another could be to manipulate neuromodulatory input to the spinal cord. Serotonin (5HT) and norepinephrine (NE) have potent effects on motoneurons, including increasing PIC amplitude, decreasing input conductance, hyperpolarizing spike threshold, and depolarizing resting potential (Hounsgaard and Kiehn, 1989, Lee and Heckman, 1999, Powers and Binder, 2001, Alaburda et al, 2002, Hultborn et al, 2004, Perrier and Delgado-Lezama, 2005, Heckman et al, 2008. Furthermore, neuromodulators are constantly scaling the level of activation of motoneurons as needed (Heckman et al, 2004).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%