2014
DOI: 10.15837/ijccc.2014.2.1013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input Projection Algorithms Influence in Prediction and Optimization of QoS Accuracy

Abstract: Regardless of new achievements in the research of prediction models, QoS is still a great issue for high quality web services and remains one of the key subjects that need to be studied. We believe that QoS should not only be measured, but have to be predicted in development and implementation phases. In this paper we assess how different input projection algorithms influence the prediction accuracy of a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) trained with large datasets of web services QoS values.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unclassified traffic (which does not fall within any user-defined class) is sent to a special class (default) using WFQ mechanism and the weights defined by it according to the equation (2).…”
Section: General Description Of the Used Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unclassified traffic (which does not fall within any user-defined class) is sent to a special class (default) using WFQ mechanism and the weights defined by it according to the equation (2).…”
Section: General Description Of the Used Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each manually configured class represents a separate queue managed by a FIFO algorithm that receives a percentage of the total bandwidth depending on how the packets are chosen for transmission to the hardware buffer. After configuration, the CBWFQ algorithm works similar to WFQ, which means that it is based on the SN value defined by the same formula as in WFQ, equation (2). It can be demonstrated that any user-defined class dominates the dynamically determined flows (WFQ) almost all the time (except when certain classes are configured with a very low percentage 1.5%, which is unlikely) [13].…”
Section: General Description Of the Used Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation