2017
DOI: 10.1044/2017_jslhr-l-17-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input Subject Diversity Accelerates the Growth of Tense and Agreement: Indirect Benefits From a Parent-Implemented Intervention

Abstract: These findings establish a link between children's sentence diversity and the development of T/A morphemes and provide evidence about characteristics of input that facilitate growth in this grammatical system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One example of a treatment approach that does this can be found in Hadley and colleagues' work on unique syntactic types. They have suggested that focusing on training a variety of sentence subjects and a variety of predicates may both diversify the syntactic frames that children use and improve grammatical morpheme accuracy (Hadley, McKenna, & Rispoli, 2018;Hadley, Rispoli, & Holt, 2017). Focusing on the category of sentence subject rather than the nonadjacent dependencies associated with agreement marking may capitalize on children's ability to use distributional learning.…”
Section: Clinical Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example of a treatment approach that does this can be found in Hadley and colleagues' work on unique syntactic types. They have suggested that focusing on training a variety of sentence subjects and a variety of predicates may both diversify the syntactic frames that children use and improve grammatical morpheme accuracy (Hadley, McKenna, & Rispoli, 2018;Hadley, Rispoli, & Holt, 2017). Focusing on the category of sentence subject rather than the nonadjacent dependencies associated with agreement marking may capitalize on children's ability to use distributional learning.…”
Section: Clinical Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utterance length in input has been argued also to predict vocabulary growth in children because longer utterances are likely to provide more information about the meaning of a new word they containeither through content or through information provided in the syntactic frames in which new words appear (Hoff, 2003). Linguistic features of child-directed speech that have been found to predict children's grammatical development include the number of different verbs used as main verbs and the number of different lexical nouns (i.e., not pronouns) used as sentence subjects (Hadley, Rispoli, & Holt, 2017;Hsu, Hadley, & Rispoli, 2017;Plante et al, 2014). The theoretical argument for why these latter variables predict grammatical development is that input that contains many different lexical items serving as sentence subjects and many different lexical items serving as main verbs provides a basis for children's abstracting the patterns that are regular across different words serving these grammatical functions (Hadley et al, 2017;Hsu et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, providing explicit information about objects and surroundings with lexical NP subjects could promote growth in USC by decreasing children's reliance on rote memorization. Recent work has provided evidence that when parents are taught to increase the diversity of their own sentence subjects through other-focused commenting, their children later use more diverse third person subjects themselves and use more adult-like tense and agreement marking compared to peers [45,46].…”
Section: Methodological and Clinical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%