2019
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2018.2853698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input-to-State Safety With Control Barrier Functions

Abstract: This letter presents a new notion of input-tostate safe control barrier functions (ISSf-CBFs), which ensure safety of nonlinear dynamical systems under input disturbances. Similar to how safety conditions are specified in terms of forward invariance of a set, input-to-state safety (ISSf) conditions are specified in terms of forward invariance of a slightly larger set. In this context, invariance of the larger set implies that the states stay either inside or very close to the smaller safe set; and this closene… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
141
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Controllers synthesized via CBFs rely on a model, and the guarantees they achieve may fail in the presence of model uncertainty. Robust control methods can ensure safety [7], [28] or quantify how safety properties degrade [9] in the presence of model uncertainty, but may be overly conservative in restricting the behavior of the system. Data-driven methods employing machine learning [19], [5] provide probabilistic safety guarantees, but may require episodic, offline training to improve model estimates [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controllers synthesized via CBFs rely on a model, and the guarantees they achieve may fail in the presence of model uncertainty. Robust control methods can ensure safety [7], [28] or quantify how safety properties degrade [9] in the presence of model uncertainty, but may be overly conservative in restricting the behavior of the system. Data-driven methods employing machine learning [19], [5] provide probabilistic safety guarantees, but may require episodic, offline training to improve model estimates [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control barrier functions (CBFs) were used to provide guarantees on the safety of continuous-time nonlinear systems with affine inputs for an adaptive cruise control application in [6]. The notion of input-to-state CBFs that ensured the safety of nonlinear systems under arbitrary input disturbances was introduced in [24], and safety was characterized in terms of the invariance of a set whose computation depended on the magnitude of the disturbance. The authors of [45] relaxed the supermartingale condition that a barrier certificate had to satisfy in [36] in order to provide finite-time guarantees on the safety of a system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety guarantees endowed by a controller synthesized via CBFs rely on an accurate model of a system's dynamics, and may degrade in the presence of model uncertainty. The recently proposed definition of Input-to-State Safety (ISSf) provides a tool for quantifying the impact on safety guarantees of such uncertainty or disturbances in the dynamics [13] by describing changes in the set kept invariant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%