2007
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.1249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input‐to‐state stabilizing sub‐optimal NMPC with an application to DC–DC converters

Abstract: SUMMARYThis article focuses on the synthesis of computationally friendly sub-optimal nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) algorithms with guaranteed robust stability. To analyse the robustness of the MPC closed-loop system, we employ the input-to-state stability (ISS) framework. To design ISS sub-optimal NMPC schemes, a new Lyapunov-based method is proposed. ISS is ensured via a set of constraints, which can be specified as a finite number of linear inequalities for input affine nonlinear systems. Further… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the Lyapunov constraint (5f), feasibility of P τ N (x) implies input-to-state stability, which allows us to state the main result of this section and prove ISS of the closed-loop system under the robust τ -RT control law κ τ (x) in (6). Note that in the considered case stability cannot be achieved by the approach described in Lazar, Roset, Heemels, Nijmeijer, and van den Bosch (2008), where a constraint on the Lyapunov decrease is only introduced in the first step, since the solutions are not recursively feasible.…”
Section: Lemma 46 (Feasibility Of the Warm-start) Letūmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the Lyapunov constraint (5f), feasibility of P τ N (x) implies input-to-state stability, which allows us to state the main result of this section and prove ISS of the closed-loop system under the robust τ -RT control law κ τ (x) in (6). Note that in the considered case stability cannot be achieved by the approach described in Lazar, Roset, Heemels, Nijmeijer, and van den Bosch (2008), where a constraint on the Lyapunov decrease is only introduced in the first step, since the solutions are not recursively feasible.…”
Section: Lemma 46 (Feasibility Of the Warm-start) Letūmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, this is the crucial item in order to prove stability of the proposed real-time MPC method. Note that in the considered case stability can therefore not be achieved by the approach described in [13], where a constraint on the Lyapunov decrease in the first step is introduced, since the solutions are not recursively feasible. In this section the results for the nominal case are extended to the uncertain case using a robust MPC method.…”
Section: Real-time Robust Mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation has attracted the attention of the control theory community approaching the problem from several perspectives, e.g. [8][9][10]. However, these solutions are concentrated only on the high-performance objective without considering the reduction of the switching frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%