2019
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2018.2829691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input Voltage Sharing Control Scheme for Input Series and Output Parallel Connected DC–DC Converters Based on Peak Current Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing (18) and (19), it is clear that B is the additional term added by the IVSR, which is only contains linear components. To eliminate B, (20) should be satisfied…”
Section: A Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparing (18) and (19), it is clear that B is the additional term added by the IVSR, which is only contains linear components. To eliminate B, (20) should be satisfied…”
Section: A Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed IVSR in [19] reduces the overshoot of the output voltage in the dynamic response by adding input current control loops. An IVSR with a peakcurrent control structure uses the sum of the compensation results of the input and output voltages as the rated value for programmed currents to reduce the output voltage disturbance when the DC supply voltage changes significantly [20]. An IVSR with a model predictive control structure improves the system dynamic response by replacing traditional controllers with digital controllers [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four basic arrangements are: the parallel-input/parallel-output (PIPO), the parallel-input/series-output (PISO), the series-input/parallel-output (SIPO), and the series-input/series-output (SISO). Various dc-dc converter topologies like the buck and buck-based [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], the boost and boost-based [11,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], and the buck-boost-based [25,[30][31][32] have been used for the constituent modules of modular converters. The semiconductor devices employed in these converters are commonly driven using pulse-width modulation (PWM) techniques with the converter being operated under voltage-mode control (VMC) or current-mode control (CMC) [1, 2, 4, 6-10, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19-26, 31, 32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Accurate SS model of PCMC requires the inclusion of the sampling effect of the current loop in its structure. Such a model can be added to the power-stage SS model in two ways: the first can be classified as circuit-oriented where a separate transfer-function block is interfaced with the power-stage model [1,6,7,10,12,19,21,22,26,32], and the second is the state-space algebraic approach where the PCMC law is augmented with the power-stage matrices. The algebraic approach requires more mathematical manipulation but is more general since it allows the CMC converter model to be obtained in symbolic state-space form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The balance among modules can be obtained through a decentralized strategy. It implies in controlling electrical quantities in the modules, which improves the steady-state and dynamics behavior of the converter [17], [18]. However, it normally drives to more complex control strategies, increasing the number of sensors and affecting reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%