1988
DOI: 10.1021/bk-1988-0382.ch024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insecticide Absorption from Indoor Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Default assumptions used to calculate human exposure and absorbed daily dosage (ADD) from environmental measurements of air and surface residues typically overestimate measurements obtained through biomonitoring (Krieger et al, 2000). Published exposure estimates following the indoor use of foggers have been as high as 50 mg/kg/day (Berteau et al, 1989), while measurements of ADD following indoor pesticide use normally range from 1 to 10 mg/kg/day . The difference between predicted and measured ADD warrants the study of potential determinants of exposure and bioavailability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Default assumptions used to calculate human exposure and absorbed daily dosage (ADD) from environmental measurements of air and surface residues typically overestimate measurements obtained through biomonitoring (Krieger et al, 2000). Published exposure estimates following the indoor use of foggers have been as high as 50 mg/kg/day (Berteau et al, 1989), while measurements of ADD following indoor pesticide use normally range from 1 to 10 mg/kg/day . The difference between predicted and measured ADD warrants the study of potential determinants of exposure and bioavailability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different methods have been used to assess dermal exposure to chemicals, but rarely have these included the use of biological markers of exposure (biomonitoring) to determine actual absorbed dosage (AD ). As a result, default assumptions are used that often inflate exposure estimates of AD ( e.g., Berteau et al, 1989 ) and may mislead risk managers who must assess chemical exposures and develop mitigation strategies. Default estimates may also be the basis of incompletely researched media coverage and casual technical evaluation that prompts unwarranted public alarm and misunderstanding of science and the regulatory process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Jacksonville, chlorpyrifos was found in 100% ofthe household indoor air (1. In addition to indoor air, insecticides can be found on floors and other surfaces and may contribute significantly to the total exposure of the general population. However, there is a paucity of data available for making an accurate assessment of the relative importance of oral (nondietary), dermal, and inhalation exposures to household pesticides (8)(9)(10) (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%