2010
DOI: 10.5194/hgss-1-25-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inseparability of science history and discovery

Abstract: Abstract. Science is very much a logical progression through time. Progressing along a logical path of discovery is rather like following a path through the wilderness. Occasionally the path splits, presenting a choice; the correct logical interpretation leads to further progress, the wrong choice leads to confusion. By considering deeply the relevant science history, one might begin to recognize past faltering in the logical progression of observations and ideas and, perhaps then, to discover new, more precis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described previously [2,16], a different and more fundamental approach to making scientific discoveries than the frequently discussed variants of the scientific method is this: An individual ponders and through tedious efforts arranges seemingly unrelated observations into a logical sequence in the mind so that causal relationships become evident and new understanding emerges, showing the path for new observations, for new experiments, for new theoretical considerations, and for new discoveries. That is the method applied here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described previously [2,16], a different and more fundamental approach to making scientific discoveries than the frequently discussed variants of the scientific method is this: An individual ponders and through tedious efforts arranges seemingly unrelated observations into a logical sequence in the mind so that causal relationships become evident and new understanding emerges, showing the path for new observations, for new experiments, for new theoretical considerations, and for new discoveries. That is the method applied here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That belief stems from committee-consensus assessments of climate computer models that are based upon assumptions. The methodology employed should cause concern as much as contemporary non-climate, solid-Earth geophysics is based on computer-models underlain by flawed assumptions [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, correcting past mistakes opens the way for new discoveries, connected logically and causally. In Table 1, I show four science mistakes that I personally corrected and the new discoveries that resulted [10]. When I realized that the inner core composition might be different from the idea of its being partially crystallized nickel-iron metal, my NASA funding ceased, and the subject became "politically incorrect", unmentionable; BIG MISTAKE!…”
Section: Science Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that our planet is experiencing global warming due to anthropogenic carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases has been hammered into public consciousness for three decades. There are good reasons to believe that political motives are driving much of the scientific work of the climate science community and the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [1]. Real science, unlike politics, is all about telling the truth, truth that is securely anchored to the properties of matter and energy (radiation) [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%