2016
DOI: 10.1002/jaba.292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inserting mastered targets during error correction when teaching skills to children with autism

Abstract: Research has identified a variety of effective approaches for responding to errors during discrete-trial training. In one commonly used method, the therapist delivers a prompt contingent on the occurrence of an incorrect response and then re-presents the trial so that the learner has an opportunity to perform the correct response independently. Some authors recommend inserting trials with previously mastered targets between the prompted response and opportunities to respond independently, but no studies have d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it is unclear how to systematically discern an optimal I/C ratio 2 Due to the wide variety of DTT arrangements and characteristics that might complement the disequilibrium approach (e.g., error correction, prompting, prompt fading, etc. ), we refer readers to Plaisance, Lerman, Laudont, and Wu (2016) for a recent discussion on DTT algorithms involving error correction and the presentation of previously acquired responses. Baseline period = 5 min (300 s)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is unclear how to systematically discern an optimal I/C ratio 2 Due to the wide variety of DTT arrangements and characteristics that might complement the disequilibrium approach (e.g., error correction, prompting, prompt fading, etc. ), we refer readers to Plaisance, Lerman, Laudont, and Wu (2016) for a recent discussion on DTT algorithms involving error correction and the presentation of previously acquired responses. Baseline period = 5 min (300 s)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the child responds correctly after the re-presented discriminative stimulus and prompt, the instructor praises to the child and presents the new trial. If the child responds incorrectly or does not respond after the re-presented discriminative stimulus and prompt, the instructor presents directly to the new trial (Carroll et al, 2015;Plaisance, Lerman, Laudont, & Wu, 2016).…”
Section: Sonuçmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, researchers should consider other definitions of efficiency (e.g., promoting greater generalization; see Wolery et al, ) and whether certain procedures might meet these definitions, despite requiring more exposures to mastery. For example, error correction that includes embedding mastered tasks (see Plaisance, Lerman, Laudont, & Wu, ) may promote greater maintenance, despite requiring similar or greater number of trials to mastery. Additional consideration might be given to procedures that are efficacious, but less efficient.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%