2017
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30516-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insertion-and-deletion-derived tumour-specific neoantigens and the immunogenic phenotype: a pan-cancer analysis

Abstract: Cancer Research UK, UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) at the Royal Marsden Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Institute of Cancer Research and University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centres, the UK Medical Research Council, the Rosetrees Trust, Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the European Research Council.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
663
5
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 789 publications
(721 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
22
663
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Based on the available data, it is clear that ICD can facilitate T cell responses against a wide-spectrum of differentiation, over-expressed, and mutated tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). [1][2][3][4][8][9][10][11][12][13] However, the predominance of a fraction of TAA-specific T cells in driving ICD-based immunity might be regulated by: (1) the spatiotemporal expression patterns of specific TAAs within a tumor, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] (2) the overall coverage of various TAAs by central or peripheral tolerance, [21][22][23] (3) the overall avidity of the T cell receptor (TCR) for specific TAA, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and (4) the general cellular and metabolic health of effector or memory T cell fractions. [33][34][35][36][37][38] Operationally, two experimental procedures have been established over the years to identify bona fide ICD inducers in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Based on the available data, it is clear that ICD can facilitate T cell responses against a wide-spectrum of differentiation, over-expressed, and mutated tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). [1][2][3][4][8][9][10][11][12][13] However, the predominance of a fraction of TAA-specific T cells in driving ICD-based immunity might be regulated by: (1) the spatiotemporal expression patterns of specific TAAs within a tumor, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] (2) the overall coverage of various TAAs by central or peripheral tolerance, [21][22][23] (3) the overall avidity of the T cell receptor (TCR) for specific TAA, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and (4) the general cellular and metabolic health of effector or memory T cell fractions. [33][34][35][36][37][38] Operationally, two experimental procedures have been established over the years to identify bona fide ICD inducers in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor mutational burden is thought to be associated with an increase of neo‐antigens that leads to the enhancement of recognition by the immune system . The analysis of pan‐cancer somatic mutation data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas for whole‐exon sequencing data from 19 kinds of cancers including 5777 solid tumors showed that ccRCC had the highest proportion of coding insertions and deletions, and papillary RCC and chromophobe RCC had the second and third highest proportion …”
Section: Biomarkers For Immune Checkpoint Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this discrepancy, Turajlic et al . reported that RCC showed the highest proportion and number of insertion and deletion mutations (indels) . Most studies about the correlation between the effect of ICI and TMB focus on SNVs.…”
Section: Biomarkers For Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%