Inside or Outside? The Impact Factors of Zoning–Land Use Mismatch

Li, Guan; Zhang, Xu; Wu, Cifang; Zhuo, Yuefei; Tong, Xinhua; Wei, Yuanyan

doi:10.3390/su12010265

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 81 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The spatial mismatch hypothesis, raised by Kain in the 1960s, was initially introduced to explore the spatial connection between residence and employment in the context of residential suburbanization [53], and was later extended to study the incomplete matching in spatial distribution of interrelated elements [54,55]. This paper employs the spatial mismatch index to portray the spatial matching of UPGS with GDP and population, which is based on Liu and Theys et al for the calculation model [56,57].…”

Section: Spatial Mismatch Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the Spatial Mode, Supply–Demand Relationship, and Driving Mechanism of Urban Park Green Space: A Case Study from China

Zhao,

Chen,

Wang

et al. 2024

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Park green space is a big part of public infrastructure in cities, and how to evaluate and optimize the mismatch of urban park green space (UPGS) has become the focus of current research in academia and industry. Taking China’s 286 cities as an example, this paper used the spatial cluster and Boston Consulting Group Matrix to analyze the aggregation laws and changing modes of UPGS from 2010 to 2020, introduced the spatial mismatch model to analyze the matching of its supply and demand with GDP and population, and adopted the Geodetector to analyze the influencing factors. The findings: (1) The evolution of UPGS in China had long been characterized by a “pyramidal” pattern, i.e., limited green cities > developing green cities > steady green cities > booming green cities, exhibiting the spatial characteristics of gradient differences between the coasts and inland areas, and the aggregation of blocks in some areas. (2) The supply and demand mismatches of the UPGS were relatively stable, with negative matching being the main supply mismatch type, and positive matching being the main demand mismatch type. The contribution of supply and demand mismatches similarly showed a spatial pattern of a gradual decrease from the coast to inland and the aggregation of blocks in some areas. (3) Five types of factors played different driving roles on UPGS, with social development remaining a weak factor, and the strong factor switching from urban infrastructure to construction land scale. The interaction detection was dominated by a bilinear enhancement, with super-interaction factors changing from an output value of the tertiary industry and population urbanization rate to education expenditure in local general public budgets. (4) Based on the mismatch between the supply and demand for UPGS in China, 286 cities were classified into four types, namely a smart shrinking zone, smart growing zone, status quo zone, and overlay policy zone, and differentiated development proposals for the corresponding zoning were put forward. This paper constructed an application framework of “evolution pattern + supply demand match + driving factors + policy zoning” for UPGS at a large scale, which will effectively enhance the effective allocation of its resources across the country.

show abstract

Section: Spatial Mismatch Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the Spatial Mode, Supply–Demand Relationship, and Driving Mechanism of Urban Park Green Space: A Case Study from China

Zhao,

Chen,

Wang

et al. 2024

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Flexibility of land use plans: Between supporting development and opportunism. Evidence from Poland

Nowak,

Śleszyński,

Cheba

et al. 2023

Land Use Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects

Wang

et al. 2022

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The question of how to implement spatial planning more effective is a fundamental but very difficult one and one that has been of great interest to both the academic and practical community. However, a comprehensive review of the conceptual models and methodological systems for evaluating spatial planning implementation, and the existing practical research results of various types of spatial planning implementation evaluation, are yet to be presented. The study systematically reviews the main research findings in the field of spatial planning implementation from four aspects: conceptual analysis, measurement methods, evaluation frameworks and evaluation methods. This study found three distinct evolutionary features of research in this field: (1) The evaluation concept changes from complete rationality to limited rationality; (2) research methodology changes from a simple closed system to a complex open system; (3) the research perspective shifts from the map to the main body of planning implementation behavior. It is suggested that an important part of future research lies in establishing a system for evaluating the effectiveness based on a single subject who is an actor in the planning implementation process. On this basis, the micro-influencing mechanisms of planning implementation effects will then be explored. Deepening the research to the individual level will help improve planning implementation’s effectiveness.

show abstract

Inside or Outside? The Impact Factors of Zoning–Land Use Mismatch

Cited by 3 publications

References 81 publications

Examining the Spatial Mode, Supply–Demand Relationship, and Driving Mechanism of Urban Park Green Space: A Case Study from China

Examining the Spatial Mode, Supply–Demand Relationship, and Driving Mechanism of Urban Park Green Space: A Case Study from China

Flexibility of land use plans: Between supporting development and opportunism. Evidence from Poland

Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About