2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insider trading in takeover targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
107
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
12
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…29 Chung, Elder, and Kim (2010) show that firms with better corporate governance have higher liquidity. 30 Agrawal and Nasser (2012) show that insiders in takeover targets engage in profitable passive insider trading by increasing their net purchases by reducing sales more than they reduce purchases. sample have zero trading during any given quarter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Chung, Elder, and Kim (2010) show that firms with better corporate governance have higher liquidity. 30 Agrawal and Nasser (2012) show that insiders in takeover targets engage in profitable passive insider trading by increasing their net purchases by reducing sales more than they reduce purchases. sample have zero trading during any given quarter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, realistically, corporate insiders may not possess equal amounts of superior information all the time. In fact, they are presumed to have more informational advantage during certain times such as prior to earnings announcements or takeover announcements (see Agrawal and Nasser, 2012;Ke et al, 2003). Insider trades are also relatively infrequent, owing to the trading restrictions imposed on them by firm trading policies.…”
Section: Prior Work On the Relation Between Insider Trading And Informentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is bolstered by evidence Agrawal and Nasser (2011),. using reported trades by insiders, document that insiders in target companies surreptitiously increase their net buys (decrease sells more than they decrease buys) before M&A announcements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%