2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insight into an implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
151
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-order nature of the DE 3 scheme is well established over the other considered methods. By order of increasing accuracy, we observe the following ranking: Newmark's scheme ((β, γ) = (1/4, 1/2)) is less accurate than Bathe's method [10]-both are second-order methods-than the DE 3 scheme that is third-order accurate in its dissipative setting (ρ ∞ = 0.5) and fourth-order accurate in its conservative setting (ρ ∞ = 1). It is observed that the requirement of twelve points per lowest period is not sufficient to ensure proper accuracy with the second-order methods whereas it does for the DE 3 scheme.…”
Section: Demonstrative Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high-order nature of the DE 3 scheme is well established over the other considered methods. By order of increasing accuracy, we observe the following ranking: Newmark's scheme ((β, γ) = (1/4, 1/2)) is less accurate than Bathe's method [10]-both are second-order methods-than the DE 3 scheme that is third-order accurate in its dissipative setting (ρ ∞ = 0.5) and fourth-order accurate in its conservative setting (ρ ∞ = 1). It is observed that the requirement of twelve points per lowest period is not sufficient to ensure proper accuracy with the second-order methods whereas it does for the DE 3 scheme.…”
Section: Demonstrative Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For this specific model, the Ω 1 case corresponds to imposing a rigid link between degree-of-freedom 1 and the boundary with imposed displacement. In the first part of this example, we compare the accuracy achieved by the DE 3 scheme to two other well-known integration schemes, namely the ones proposed by Newmark [1] and Bathe [10]. In the second part, we illustrate the utility of numerical damping in structural simulations and, in particular, the property of spectral annihilation that the DE 3 scheme enjoys when used in its most dissipative setting.…”
Section: Demonstrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the solution of the 3 degree-of-freedo m spring system [20]. For simp licity, all the three masses are assumed to be unity.…”
Section: Spring-mass Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternate method to construct time integration methods with reliable numerical dissipation for nonlinear problems is the use of a composite algorithm as presented by Bathe and coworkers [5,3,4,6]. The main idea of this approach is to combine a non-dissipative method and a dissipative method into a one-step but multistage composite scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%