2021
DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2021.1881796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insight into ion exchange column dynamics through application of an analytical model of system performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cs distribution was highest at low Na concentrations and the associated matrix also contributed to Cs distribution values, where solutions with CO 3 2– and lower nitrate resulted in a higher distribution constant. Without running a full ion exchange column test, which is costly and time-consuming, the batch contact work herein should suffice for estimation of load behavior in a process setting …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cs distribution was highest at low Na concentrations and the associated matrix also contributed to Cs distribution values, where solutions with CO 3 2– and lower nitrate resulted in a higher distribution constant. Without running a full ion exchange column test, which is costly and time-consuming, the batch contact work herein should suffice for estimation of load behavior in a process setting …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without running a full ion exchange column test, which is costly and time-consuming, the batch contact work herein should suffice for estimation of load behavior in a process setting. 18…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effluent was collected in a bulk container, where the concentration in the effluent is an average of the full sampling interval or using a fraction collector. The column data was fit using an approximation from Hougen and Marshall, which has been successfully applied to well-behaved column systems previously. , Fits, where possible, were done individually on iodate (first 10% breakthrough) or iodide (remaining 90% breakthrough). The data was fit using eq to minimize the sum of squares in Excel using the Solver function. C BV C 0 = 1 2 [ 1 + erf false( k 1 BV k 2 z false) ] where C BV is the effluent concentration after a number of BV, C 0 is the column inlet iodine concentration, erf is the Excel error function, k 1 is the column fitting parameter defined in eq , BV is the bed volumes passed, k 2 is the column fitting parameter as defined in eq , and z is the column length…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The column data was fit using an approximation from Hougen and Marshall, 53 which has been successfully applied to wellbehaved column systems previously. 54,55 were done individually on iodate (first 10% breakthrough) or iodide (remaining 90% breakthrough). The data was fit using eq 6 to minimize the sum of squares in Excel using the Solver function.…”
Section: Purolite A530e (A530)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Recent development of a scaled, tankside cesium removal prototype utilizing crystalline silicotitanate has facilitated treatment of the liquid fraction of the waste. [8][9][10] With the successful startup of the tank-side Cs removal facility, the next significant challenge will be associated with treatment of the balance of the insoluble fraction of the waste that contains most of long lived radionuclides such as plutonium, uranium and neptunium. 11 A number of processes utilizing dissolution and leaching and have been developed to reduce the mass of insoluble solids present, 12,13 however all of these processes ultimately rely upon solid-liquid separation to produce a concentrated slurry for eventual disposition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%