2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insight into the efficient co-removal of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) by positively charged UiO-66-NH2 decorated ultrafiltration membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study developed by Vinodhini et al [39], UF acetate cellulose and nanochitosan membranes showed Cr rejections varying between 78.5% (initial rejection) and 30.33% (rejection after 90 min of operation) when using feed solutions with 200 ppm of Cr(VI) at pH 5, which were explained by the adsorption of Cr to the amine groups of chitosan. Efficient Cr(VI) and Cr(III) rejections were also reported by Zhang et al [40] using ultrafiltration membranes decorated with positively charged UiO-66-NH 2 compounds, from feed solutions containing 10.4 mg/L of these ions. The removal of Cr(VI) was explained by the electrostatic attraction to the positive charges in the membrane, whereas concentrations of Cr(III) lower than 1.5 mg/L in the effluent (stable during the operation time) were obtained with MOF@PVDF-0.02 and PEI/MOF@PVDF-0.02 membranes.…”
Section: Diafiltration Of the Sw30 Concentrate Solution-synthetic Tannery Effluentsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In a study developed by Vinodhini et al [39], UF acetate cellulose and nanochitosan membranes showed Cr rejections varying between 78.5% (initial rejection) and 30.33% (rejection after 90 min of operation) when using feed solutions with 200 ppm of Cr(VI) at pH 5, which were explained by the adsorption of Cr to the amine groups of chitosan. Efficient Cr(VI) and Cr(III) rejections were also reported by Zhang et al [40] using ultrafiltration membranes decorated with positively charged UiO-66-NH 2 compounds, from feed solutions containing 10.4 mg/L of these ions. The removal of Cr(VI) was explained by the electrostatic attraction to the positive charges in the membrane, whereas concentrations of Cr(III) lower than 1.5 mg/L in the effluent (stable during the operation time) were obtained with MOF@PVDF-0.02 and PEI/MOF@PVDF-0.02 membranes.…”
Section: Diafiltration Of the Sw30 Concentrate Solution-synthetic Tannery Effluentsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The adsorption mechanism of UiO-66-NH 2 is expected to be the ion exchange and electrostatic effect of -NH 2 and -COOH groups, combined with the material's nano-porous structure. 39,40 To investigate the competitive adsorption, the hybrid aerogel was immersed in a mixture solution containing 10 heavy metals, the results of which are presented in Fig. S9 (ESI †).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure S5 and Table S6, after treatment by CuO for 48 h at 35 °C, the concentration of Cr 3+ was significantly reduced from 3438 to 0.06 mg/L, which was much below the discharge standard limit (GB 30486-2013; total Cr = 1.5 mg/L). 45,46 On the basis of the above results, it could be reasonably concluded that CuO was an efficient mineralization stabilizer for the removal of Cr 3+ ions from wastewater. 3+ .…”
Section: Superstable Mineralization Of Crmentioning
confidence: 75%