Insights and Opportunities Offered by a Rapid Ecosystem Service Assessment in Promoting a Conservation Agenda in an Urban Biodiversity Hotspot

Abstract

. 2012. Insights and opportunities offered by a rapid ecosystem service assessment in promoting a conservation agenda in an urban biodiversity hotspot. ABSTRACT. Regional and global scale ecosystem service assessments have demonstrated the socioeconomic value of protecting biodiversity and have been integrated into associated policy. Local government decision makers are still unsure of the applicability, return on investment, and usefulness of these assessments in aiding their decision making. Cape Town, a developing city in a globally recognized biodiversity hotspot, has numerous competing land uses. City managers, with a tightly constrained budget, requested an exploratory study on the links between ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation within this municipal area. We set out to develop and test a simple and rapid ecosystem service assessment method aimed at determining the contribution natural vegetation remnants make to ecosystem service provision. We took selected services, identified in conjunction with city managers, and assessed these in two ways. First we used an area weighted approach to attribute services to vegetation types and assessed how these had changed through time and into the future given development needs. Second, we did a regulatory and cultural service remnant distance analysis to better understand proximity effects and linkages. Provisioning services were found to have been most severely affected through vegetation transformation. Regulatory services have been similarly affected, and these losses are more significant because regulatory services can only function in situ and cannot be outsourced in the way provisioning services can. The most significant losses were in coastal zone protection and flood mitigation services, both of which will be placed under even greater pressure given the predicted changes in climatic regimes. The role of remnant vegetation in regulating and cultural services was shown to be a significant additional consideration in making the case for conservation in the city. Our rapid assessment approach does not allow for nuanced and individual understanding of the trade-offs presented by individual remnant patches, but is particularly strong in quickly identifying issues, key focus areas, and opportunities provided by this research direction, and thereby serving to facilitate and drive constructive engagement between ecosystem service experts and city planners.

A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research

“…Articles focus on the development or specification of methods, tools or instruments in relation to urban ecosystem services, including those that can be used to model (or manage) urban ecosystem services related issues as well as analysis and modeling tools (e.g. spatial models or urban assessment frameworks) (see for example: Beck et al, 2010;O'Farrell et al, 2012;.…”

Sustainable drainage system site assessment method using urban ecosystem services

“…Tzoulas and James (2009) developed their method to provide a way to analyse the biodiversity potential and subsequent ecosystem services of urban green spaces. This method was chosen ahead of other rapid, nonexpert, ecosystem services site assessment methods (O'Farrell et al 2012;Peh et al 2013;Uzomah et al 2014;Beumer and Martens 2015), because it allowed for ecologically justifiable biodiversity assessments to be carried out and was proven to work effectively when used by non-specialists (Tzoulas and James 2009;Iswoyo et al 2013;Voigt and Wurster 2015). However, in order to examine the ecosystem services of vegetated SuDS sites, several modifications to the Tzoulas-James method were made.…”

African dreams: locating urban infrastructure in the 2030 sustainable developmental agenda

“…The anti-urban bias is fast receding (Myers, 2014), ushered out by evidence of the rate and scale of urbanization and a growing interest in the urban dimensions of topics as diverse as violence (Fox & Beall, 2012), economic prosperity (Mitlin, Satterthwaite, Tacoli, & Turok, 2009;Turok, 2013), social polarization (Crankshaw, 2012), environmental poverty (Satterthwaite, 2003), the burden of disease (Smit, 2012), food security (Frayne et al, 2010), youth (Diouf, 1996;Honwana, 2012;Simone, 2005) and biodiversity (O'Farrell, Anderson, Le Maitre, & Holmes, 2012). In this regard, African studies is undergoing an internal city-centric reworking that mirrors the urban transformations of the continent and the world (McPhearson et al, 2016).…”