2018
DOI: 10.15171/hpp.2018.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights for public education provided by French media on ideas about prostate cancer – A media analysis study

Abstract: Background: This study explored the French media’s presentation of ideas and medical information about prostate cancer (PC) that may influence men’s understanding, attitudes and behavior. Methods: A qualitative media content analysis centered on PC information delivered by French professional media. The selected data were produced in the aftermath of the High Health Authority's decision in 2008 not to recommend systematic screening by prostate specific antigen(PSA) for men over 50. Source was the Media Archive… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, in the present analysis, we were unable to explore whether quoted residents were only those who had been in attendance at the press event versus other independent sources sought by the online media. Second, we were not able to examine whether inclusion of interviews with residents in the online media coverage of the Fos EPSEAL study differed from that observed in the online media coverage of other, non-CBPR health studies broadly (Ponnou & Gonon, 2017; Zanchetta et al, 2018). Analyses of this nature may be of interest to other researchers implementing a CBPR approach in their work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in the present analysis, we were unable to explore whether quoted residents were only those who had been in attendance at the press event versus other independent sources sought by the online media. Second, we were not able to examine whether inclusion of interviews with residents in the online media coverage of the Fos EPSEAL study differed from that observed in the online media coverage of other, non-CBPR health studies broadly (Ponnou & Gonon, 2017; Zanchetta et al, 2018). Analyses of this nature may be of interest to other researchers implementing a CBPR approach in their work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%