2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13137508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights from an Evaluation of Nitrate Load Estimation Methods in the Midwestern United States

Abstract: This study investigated the accuracy and suitability of several methods commonly used to estimate riverine nitrate loads at eight watersheds located southwest of Lake Erie in the Midwestern United States. This study applied various regression methods, including a regression estimator with five, six, and seven parameters, an estimator enhanced by composite, triangular, and rectangular error corrections with residual and proportional adjustment methods, the weighted regressions on time, discharge, and season (WR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow-weighted average concentration ratio method and error correction techniques were found to improve load estimate accuracy. The accuracy of regression-based methods, such as WRTDS (Weighted Regression on Time, Discharge, and Season) and LOADEST (LOAD ESTimator), for estimating nitrate loads from sparse measurements in agricultural watersheds was investigated [4,5] and compared to that of the physical-based SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model and simple linear interpolation. The bias factor method was evaluated for addressing missing extreme concentrations in aquatic exposure assessments when sampling frequency is less than daily, using a dataset of 69 near-daily sampled site-years and various sampling designs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flow-weighted average concentration ratio method and error correction techniques were found to improve load estimate accuracy. The accuracy of regression-based methods, such as WRTDS (Weighted Regression on Time, Discharge, and Season) and LOADEST (LOAD ESTimator), for estimating nitrate loads from sparse measurements in agricultural watersheds was investigated [4,5] and compared to that of the physical-based SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model and simple linear interpolation. The bias factor method was evaluated for addressing missing extreme concentrations in aquatic exposure assessments when sampling frequency is less than daily, using a dataset of 69 near-daily sampled site-years and various sampling designs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the numerous studies focused on improving nutrient load estimation techniques and addressing their uncertainties [2][3][4][5][7][8][9][10][11][12], there is still a need for further research on the influence of sampling frequency and estimation methods on the uncertainty of nutrient load estimates under different seasonal and hydrological conditions, especially during high-flow seasons and extreme precipitation events. This study aims to address the knowledge gap by focusing on an agricultural watershed dominated by non-point source pollution in the Yiluo River Basin, China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%