“…In all, our results could not replicate seminal laboratory work on pupillometry (cf., Beatty & Kahneman, 1966;Hess & Polt, 1960;Kahneman et al, 1969; or more recently, Moyes, Sari-sarraf, & Gilbert, 2019) and highlights the challenges in reaching external validity. Research on driving (cf., Recarte & Nunes, 2003), air traffic control (cf., Ahlstrom & Friedman-berg, 2006) and, for instance, piloting (cf., Causse et al, 2016) and surgery performance (cf., Dalveren et al, 2018;Erridge et al, 2017) already made great strides in closing this gap. While being seated and at a predominantly stable distance to experimental the stimuli, pupillometry in these contexts might become robust as soon as, i.a., variations in luminance (Lohani, Payne, & Strayer, 2019) and curvilinear effects can be accounted for.…”