2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights from the animal kingdom

Abstract: Just as we have learned a great deal in consumer psychology by focusing on understanding how different sub‐groups of humans think, this paper suggests that we can also learn from examining how different types of animals think. To that end, this manuscript offers a review of literature on topics in animal cognition that have also been investigated by consumer researchers. It first reviews research that has identified ways in which animals and humans are similar and then reviews research that has identified ways… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
(173 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They aggregate into large mixed-sex social groups, in which they form strict dominance hierarchies. Their frequent and highly complex social interactions make them an ideal model species for understanding social cognition and behavior [ 12 , 13 ]. Rhesus monkeys are highly social, attend to others to gather information, show rudimentary understanding of the intentions of others, care for kin, may give up rewards to alleviate pain in others, and have a genetic basis for some social behaviors [ 13 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They aggregate into large mixed-sex social groups, in which they form strict dominance hierarchies. Their frequent and highly complex social interactions make them an ideal model species for understanding social cognition and behavior [ 12 , 13 ]. Rhesus monkeys are highly social, attend to others to gather information, show rudimentary understanding of the intentions of others, care for kin, may give up rewards to alleviate pain in others, and have a genetic basis for some social behaviors [ 13 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cullen, 1997) and perhaps raises concerns of the usefulness of such experimentation. This ethical dilemma is further highlighted by the same such experiments which have revealed the advanced abilities and sensitivities of non-human animals, as well as such traits as a sense of humour and self-awareness (Morwitz, 2014). However, the focus of concern surrounding the issue of bioethics tends to be on the humans (Salter & Harvey, 2014), rather than on the animals themselves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilising an ethic of care approach, resting “on the premise of nonviolence” (Gilligan, 1993, p. 174), the consideration of the animal’s side of these experimental interactions could lead to their increased visibility within research contexts and, perhaps, improved outcomes for their own lives. Of assistance could be the study of those who work closely with animals as they “need to understand how animals think in order to do their jobs well” (Morwitz, 2014, p. 573). Such a closer understanding of animals could potentially impact consumer choices regarding the purchase of animal products and Morwitz calls for further research addressing how concrete relationships with animals impacts human behaviour and consumption choices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%