1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6297(199711/12)13:6<587::aid-agr4>3.3.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights from the Crop Insurance Reform Act of 1994

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1994 FCIR eliminated the use of emergency legislation for agricultural crop disaster assistance, thereby making future disaster payments subject to discretionary spending caps. Together with mandatory catastrophic coverage, these requirements were meant to send a signal that future disaster payments were unlikely (see Jose and Valluru 1997). 13 Congress, however, rescinded the catastrophiccoverage mandate after just 1 year.…”
Section: Figure 3 Indemnity and Disaster Payments Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1994 FCIR eliminated the use of emergency legislation for agricultural crop disaster assistance, thereby making future disaster payments subject to discretionary spending caps. Together with mandatory catastrophic coverage, these requirements were meant to send a signal that future disaster payments were unlikely (see Jose and Valluru 1997). 13 Congress, however, rescinded the catastrophiccoverage mandate after just 1 year.…”
Section: Figure 3 Indemnity and Disaster Payments Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%