2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2012.05639.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights from the Jan Mayen system in the Norwegian-Greenland sea-I. Mapping of a microcontinent

Abstract: SUMMARY In this contribution, we present a model of microcontinent architecture within a system that involves a complex rifted margin setting and different phases of deformation and continental breakup. Our case study is the Jan Mayen Microcontinent (JMMC) located in the central part of the Norwegian–Greenland Sea. We have revised its basement and sedimentary geometries using modern and vintage seismic reflection profiles, and updated potential field data. The northern part of the JMMC consists of a ∼10–15 km … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(209 reference statements)
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At that time, the Kolbeinsey Ridge started to develop from the south, with final detachment of the Jan Mayen microcontinent from East Greenland occurring at 20 Ma (Chron C6b) Peron-Pinvidic et al 2012). The thickness of the oceanic crust that was formed in the northern portions of the Aegir and Kolbeinsey ridges differs significantly (Fig.…”
Section: Thickness Of Oceanic Crustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that time, the Kolbeinsey Ridge started to develop from the south, with final detachment of the Jan Mayen microcontinent from East Greenland occurring at 20 Ma (Chron C6b) Peron-Pinvidic et al 2012). The thickness of the oceanic crust that was formed in the northern portions of the Aegir and Kolbeinsey ridges differs significantly (Fig.…”
Section: Thickness Of Oceanic Crustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The north part of the Kolbeinsey ridge (NKR) has been investigated geochemically from dredged samples (red circles [ Haase et al , ], yellow circles [ Mertz et al , ], yellow triangles [ Elkins et al , ], and white triangles [ Campsie et al , ]). The white dashed line represents the location of the continental ocean boundary (COB) around the JMMC by Breivik et al [] incorporating results from Kandilarov et al [], while the red dashed line shows the COB by Peron‐Pinvidic et al [, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The JMMC separated from east Greenland at about 24 Ma [ Talwani and Eldholm , ; Vogt et al , ; Gaina et al , ] (Figure ). The continent‐ocean transition (COT) along the JMMC margins was constrained by Peron‐Pinvidic et al [, ] mainly based on seismic reflection data combined with magnetic and gravity data. Wide‐angle seismic data further constrains the northern boundary of the JMMC which coincides with the continuation of the northern lineament of the East Jan Mayen Fracture Zone (EJMFZ) [ Kandilarov et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During Paleocene rifting, the JMMC was still part of Greenland (Gaina et al 2009). Break-up in the Early Eocene occurred between the JMMC and the mid-Norway and Faroe margins along the Aegir Ridge, and is imaged by regional SDRs along the eastern margin of the JMMC (Peron-Pinvidic et al 2012). At 30 Ma, the Aegir Ridge became extinct and the separation of the JMMC from East Greenland was completed at 20 Ma (Gaina et al 2009) when a seafloor spreading system developed along the Kolbeinsey Ridge.…”
Section: Margins Of the Jan Mayen Microcontinentmentioning
confidence: 99%