2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta07133d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into constitutional isomeric effects on donor–acceptor intermolecular arrangements in non-fullerene organic solar cells

Abstract: The novel constitutional isomeric acceptors (o-F-ITIC and m-F-ITIC) are developed and they show the huge disparity of intermolecular interactions and/or arrangements with the donor polymer leading a significant variation in PCE of OSCs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CG-MD simulations of the morphological characteristics of high-efficiency polymer:NF-SMA systems have started to emerge. Lee and colleagues have studied the morphology of PBDB-T:F-ITIC blends using the Martini force field [77]; they compared the o-F-ITIC and m-F-ITIC isomers and highlighted several morphological distinctions. Although the difference between the two acceptors is just the location of the fluorine atoms on the side chain (ortho versus meta positions), the PBDB-T:o-F-ITIC blend presents a larger interfacial area and more extended PBDB-T chains.…”
Section: From Local To Global Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CG-MD simulations of the morphological characteristics of high-efficiency polymer:NF-SMA systems have started to emerge. Lee and colleagues have studied the morphology of PBDB-T:F-ITIC blends using the Martini force field [77]; they compared the o-F-ITIC and m-F-ITIC isomers and highlighted several morphological distinctions. Although the difference between the two acceptors is just the location of the fluorine atoms on the side chain (ortho versus meta positions), the PBDB-T:o-F-ITIC blend presents a larger interfacial area and more extended PBDB-T chains.…”
Section: From Local To Global Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halogenation at the core unit or at the end group of the NF‐SMAs with different number of halogen atoms or in different substituted position/aromatic groups is a significantly effective strategy to modulate molecular energy levels and absorption range and improve the blend morphology and device performance. [ 66–80 ] Compared with the popular fluorinated or chlorinated IC functionalized NF‐SMAs, although brominated NF‐SMAs show lower synthesis cost and are much easier for postmodification, the brominated IC has been less incorporated into NF‐SMAs. [ 14,69,70,79,80 ] Until recently, Prof. Li's and Prof. Chen's groups independently reported the monobrominated IC functionalized NF‐SMAs with different core unit, which both exhibited slightly higher PCE in comparison with corresponding monofluorinated IC functionalized NF‐SMAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reported high‐performance FREAs used 1FIC or 2FIC as end groups (e.g., ITIC‐Th1, [ 12 ] FOIC, [ 14 ] IT‐4F, [ 35 ] and Y6 [ 36 ] ), and the PCEs of OSCs based on fluorinated FREAs reached 17–18%. [ 37,38 ] A few works studied the effects of fluorination on end groups [ 8,39,40 ] or side chains [ 41 ] separately, but a comparison of end‐group and side‐chain fluorinations has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%