2015
DOI: 10.1111/aje.12244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into long‐distance dispersal by African wild dogs in East Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern might be explained by differences in the cost/benefit ratio of hunting smaller prey (Creel Creel, 2002), but it also aligns with a basic prediction of competition theory, that a subordinate competitor can persist by adopting a generalist strategy that reduces niche overlap with dominant competitors that specialize on the most profitable niche space. Contrary to expectation, space use by African wild dogs was positively related to utilization by lions and hyenas, a result that contrasts sharply with prior comparisons both across ecosystems (Creel & Creel, 1996;Swanson et al, 2014) and within ecosystems (Creel & Creel, 2002;Masenga et al, 2015;Mills & Gorman, 1997;Vanak et al, 2013). In these ecosystems, African wild dogs persisted stably over long periods, while they disappeared from LPNP and other open grassland systems dominated by wildebeest (Estes & Goddard, 1967;Fanshawe & Fitzgibbon, 1993), suggesting that spatial niche partitioning may be critical for competitive coexistence of wild dogs with dominant competitors.…”
Section: Relationships Of African Wild Dogs To Dominant Competitorscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern might be explained by differences in the cost/benefit ratio of hunting smaller prey (Creel Creel, 2002), but it also aligns with a basic prediction of competition theory, that a subordinate competitor can persist by adopting a generalist strategy that reduces niche overlap with dominant competitors that specialize on the most profitable niche space. Contrary to expectation, space use by African wild dogs was positively related to utilization by lions and hyenas, a result that contrasts sharply with prior comparisons both across ecosystems (Creel & Creel, 1996;Swanson et al, 2014) and within ecosystems (Creel & Creel, 2002;Masenga et al, 2015;Mills & Gorman, 1997;Vanak et al, 2013). In these ecosystems, African wild dogs persisted stably over long periods, while they disappeared from LPNP and other open grassland systems dominated by wildebeest (Estes & Goddard, 1967;Fanshawe & Fitzgibbon, 1993), suggesting that spatial niche partitioning may be critical for competitive coexistence of wild dogs with dominant competitors.…”
Section: Relationships Of African Wild Dogs To Dominant Competitorscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly pertinent given that during the five months post‐vaccination, the two wild dog packs spilt up and formed five packs (Burrows et al, ). Such dynamics have been observed in the Serengeti Ecosystem to result in dispersing pack members covering hundreds of kilometers (Masenga et al, ). Lacking satellite GPS telemetry, such movements would most likely have gone undetected, and the study animals would not have been sighted again.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Dispersal and pack formation did occur outside SNP with packs establishing both within the LGCA and NCA as well as further away in Kenya (Masenga et al, ). However, no new or established packs returned to occupy the Serengeti plains region where they were studied between 1964 and 1991.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations