Insights into Polymeric Materials for Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology

Heboyan, Artak; Zafar, Muhammad Sohail; Karobari, Mohmed Isaqali; Tribst, João Paulo Mendes

doi:10.3390/ma15155383

Cited by 21 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An example could be to measure the percentage of overall volume loss of the tooth. A possible next step in research could be to study volumetric assessments associated with other factors that affect TPM tool measurement as well as the wear detection in different restorative materials [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Additionally, another variable to consider would be the anatomy of each defect and the possible differences between the TPM tool and other digital patient monitoring software.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of defect size and tooth anatomy in the measurements of a 3D patient monitoring tool

Gimenez-Gonzalez¹,

Setyo²,

Picaza³

et al. 2022

Heliyon

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of defect size and tooth anatomy in the measurements of a 3D patient monitoring tool

Gimenez-Gonzalez¹,

Setyo²,

Picaza³

et al. 2022

Heliyon

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It is important to note that they have many disadvantages, including the fact that they are highly susceptible to contamination by bacteria (like endotoxins), lack tunability, react immunologically, degrade at an uncontrollable rate, and do not have a mechanical expectations. In terms of biological aspects, these have several disadvantages in terms of their lack of cellular adhesion sites, so they require chemical modification to enhance the cells’ adhesion to them to improve their performance ( Heboyan et al, 2018a ; Heboyan et al, 2018b ; Heboyan et al, 2020a ; Heboyan et al, 2020b ; Heboyan et al, 2021b ; Reddy et al, 2021 ; Heboyan et al, 2022b ; Heboyan et al, 2022c ; Marya et al, 2022c ; Heboyan et al, 2022d ; Heboyan et al, 2022e ; Heboyan et al, 2022f ; Kakkad et al, 2022 ; Karobari et al, 2022 ). The following describes the most synthetic materials used in craniofacial TE.…”

Section: Synthetic Scaffoldsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview

Yazdanian

Alam²,

Abbasi³

et al. 2022

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The state-of-the-art approach to regenerating different tissues and organs is tissue engineering which includes the three parts of stem cells (SCs), scaffolds, and growth factors. Cellular behaviors such as propagation, differentiation, and assembling the extracellular matrix (ECM) are influenced by the cell’s microenvironment. Imitating the cell’s natural environment, such as scaffolds, is vital to create appropriate tissue. Craniofacial tissue engineering refers to regenerating tissues found in the brain and the face parts such as bone, muscle, and artery. More biocompatible and biodegradable scaffolds are more commensurate with tissue remodeling and more appropriate for cell culture, signaling, and adhesion. Synthetic materials play significant roles and have become more prevalent in medical applications. They have also been used in different forms for producing a microenvironment as ECM for cells. Synthetic scaffolds may be comprised of polymers, bioceramics, or hybrids of natural/synthetic materials. Synthetic scaffolds have produced ECM-like materials that can properly mimic and regulate the tissue microenvironment’s physical, mechanical, chemical, and biological properties, manage adherence of biomolecules and adjust the material’s degradability. The present review article is focused on synthetic materials used in craniofacial tissue engineering in recent decades.

show abstract

“…Posterior rehabilitation using 3D-printed dental implants and synthetic regenerative biomaterials P E E K i s a h i g h -d e n s i t y p o l y m e r i c biomaterials that can replace metal in many restoration modalities. This material presents a good chemimcal stability and avoid biofilm colonization [37]. In this sense, at the second stage surgery, peek abutments were used to control the healthy healing of the peri-implant mucosa.…”

Section: Lopes Et Almentioning

confidence: 99%

Posterior rehabilitation using 3D-printed dental implants and synthetic regenerative membranes

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To describe through a clinical case report the surgical sequence of rehabilitation with 3D-printed implants associated with maxillary sinus floor lift with synthetic regenerative materials, including biphasic bioceramic. Case Report: Patient had an agenesis of the upper left premolars (#12 and #13), a vertical bone deficiency caused by maxillary sinus' pneumatization, and a horizontal alveolar resorption around the missing teeth area. During the surgical procedures, incisions, detachment, and osteotomy were performed in the lateral region of the maxillary sinus. The sinus membrane was detached and lifted 10 mm. Then, a thick poly(dioxanone)-based synthetic resorbable membrane (Plenum) was inserted and adapted inside the sinus to protect the sinus membrane. After the osteotomies with sub-instrumentation, 3D-printed implants (Plenum) were installed in the #12 area (3.5mm x 11.5 mm; 30N) and #13 area (4.0mm x 10mm; 20N). The maxillary sinus was entirely filled with a biphasic bioceramic, HA/β-TCP (70:30) 500-1000 μm (Plenum) and covered by the same synthetic resorbable membrane. Connective tissue graft from the palatal area was positioned internally to the flap and stabilized with sutures to improve the vestibular tissue architecture. The entire surgical wound was sutured, and the tissues stabilized. No complications occurred in the postoperative period. Conclusion: The use of synthetic regenerative memberane and 3D-printed implants seems to be a promising option in areas of deficient bone remnants.

show abstract

Insights into Polymeric Materials for Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology

Abstract: Nowadays, a large variety of prostheses both in medicine and dentistry are increasingly made of polymers and polymer-based materials [...]

Cited by 21 publications

References 21 publications

Effect of defect size and tooth anatomy in the measurements of a 3D patient monitoring tool

Effect of defect size and tooth anatomy in the measurements of a 3D patient monitoring tool

Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview

Posterior rehabilitation using 3D-printed dental implants and synthetic regenerative membranes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About