2021
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into Sars‐CoV‐2 vaccination in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis on systemic treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, extensive reviews regarding this topic are available, and deduce a satisfactory safety profile with various biologicals [75]. For example, anti-IL-17 drugs are not expected to significantly impair the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines based on experiences with influenza vaccines [76]. Interestingly, apremilast (a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor) has been associated with a low risk of flares of psoriasis, while at the same time enabling a sufficient vaccine immune response [77].…”
Section: Th17-polarized Cutaneous Inflammation 331 Psoriasis Vulgarismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extensive reviews regarding this topic are available, and deduce a satisfactory safety profile with various biologicals [75]. For example, anti-IL-17 drugs are not expected to significantly impair the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines based on experiences with influenza vaccines [76]. Interestingly, apremilast (a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor) has been associated with a low risk of flares of psoriasis, while at the same time enabling a sufficient vaccine immune response [77].…”
Section: Th17-polarized Cutaneous Inflammation 331 Psoriasis Vulgarismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the face of this pandemic, having some degree of immunity is better than having none. EADV task force on quality of life and patient‐oriented outcome recently advised psoriatic patients to receive COVID‐19 vaccine and those who had COVID‐19 infection to continue following health measures to protect themselves and others 12 …”
Section: Psoriasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the second vaccination, the patient was being treated with deucravacitinib as part of a clinical trial and was completely clear of lesions. Other authors have noted that while there is a theoretical possibility that immunosuppressive treatment may lead to a less effective immune response to the vaccine, a biological would need to be discontinued for several weeks during which time there would be a reasonable probability that there would be disease recurrence [9]. Thus, while there may be some doubts about the ability of an immunosuppressed patient to mount an optimal immunological response to COVID-19 vaccines, vaccination is nonetheless considered to provide some degree of protection against SARS-CoV-2 [9].…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have noted that while there is a theoretical possibility that immunosuppressive treatment may lead to a less effective immune response to the vaccine, a biological would need to be discontinued for several weeks during which time there would be a reasonable probability that there would be disease recurrence [9]. Thus, while there may be some doubts about the ability of an immunosuppressed patient to mount an optimal immunological response to COVID-19 vaccines, vaccination is nonetheless considered to provide some degree of protection against SARS-CoV-2 [9]. Indeed, both the National Psoriasis Foundation and the American College of Rheumatology have recommended that such patients receive COVID-19 vaccination, consistent with age restrictions, since the benefits outweigh the possible risk of a new-onset autoimmunity [10,11].…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%