2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the interaction of iodide and iodine with Cu(II)-loaded bispicolylamine chelating resin and applications for nuclear waste treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This said, the literature does broadly show that Agbearing adsorbents are superior in selectivity to Cu, Pb and other equivalents, verses competing ions such as chloride and carbonate [42,48], with reported distribution coefficients at least two orders of magnitude higher [15]. The same is true for adsorption in alkaline conditions, relevant to spent caustic scrub solution [15,20,24] and can be rationalised by considering the K sp values of the relevant metal hydroxides and carbonates (Table 2). Very little work has been carried out at strongly acidic pH, partially because of the invariable loss of metal from the adsorbent surface [13,24], which could cause downstream processing issues, but also because iodine can be driven into the gaseous phase from acidic solutions by sparging [11].…”
Section: Appropriate Choice Of Functionalising Metal and Adsorbent Matrixmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This said, the literature does broadly show that Agbearing adsorbents are superior in selectivity to Cu, Pb and other equivalents, verses competing ions such as chloride and carbonate [42,48], with reported distribution coefficients at least two orders of magnitude higher [15]. The same is true for adsorption in alkaline conditions, relevant to spent caustic scrub solution [15,20,24] and can be rationalised by considering the K sp values of the relevant metal hydroxides and carbonates (Table 2). Very little work has been carried out at strongly acidic pH, partially because of the invariable loss of metal from the adsorbent surface [13,24], which could cause downstream processing issues, but also because iodine can be driven into the gaseous phase from acidic solutions by sparging [11].…”
Section: Appropriate Choice Of Functionalising Metal and Adsorbent Matrixmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It must also be considered that many of the aqueous streams, from which iodine removal could be attempted, feature extreme pHs [21]. Even mildly acidic conditions change iodine speciation from predominantly iodide to more hydrophobic species, while a high pH entails high concentrations of hydroxide and possibly carbonate anions [22], which can severely limit the exchange of anions on to the solid phase, due to competition for binding sites [23][24][25].…”
Section: The Challenges Of Aqueous Iodine Adsorption In the Nuclear Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations