2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra04935d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the nitridation of zero-valent iron nanoparticles for the facile synthesis of iron nitride nanoparticles

Abstract: The process of nitridation of zero-valent iron nanoparticles (ZVINPs) is investigated by employing two different synthesis strategies such as solvothermal method and gas diffusion using N2 and NH3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it refers to an iron oxide phase, it was not detected in the XRD patterns (Figure a), as most likely, only a thin layer was formed due to surface oxidation. Similar findings were reported in other systems too. , The proof of nitride formation can be seen in Figure b, though. Since the N 1s peak of iron nitride was recorded in the absence of graphene, it was deconvoluted into three features at binding energies of 398.6, 400.6, and 404.1 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although it refers to an iron oxide phase, it was not detected in the XRD patterns (Figure a), as most likely, only a thin layer was formed due to surface oxidation. Similar findings were reported in other systems too. , The proof of nitride formation can be seen in Figure b, though. Since the N 1s peak of iron nitride was recorded in the absence of graphene, it was deconvoluted into three features at binding energies of 398.6, 400.6, and 404.1 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar findings were reported in other systems too. 37,44 The proof of nitride formation can be seen in Figure 3b, though. Since the N 1s peak of iron nitride was recorded in the absence of graphene, it was deconvoluted into three features at binding energies of 398.6, 400.6, and 404.1 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of these two peaks, the Fe 2p 3/2 is much narrower and stronger when compared to Fe 2p 1/2 . The Fe 2p 3/2 peak can further be deconvoluted to three peaks centred at 708.9, 710.2, and 711.8 eV which correspond to iron-ligand covalency [31], Fe-N bond [32], and iron oxynitride moieties [33] respectively. The deconvolution of Fe 2p 1/2 peaks shows two peaks at 722.7 and 724.4 eV, which correspond to iron carbide clusters [34] and Fe 3 C [35], respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%