2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the tectonic evolution of the North China Craton through comparative tectonic analysis: A record of outward growth of Precambrian continents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
163
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
5
163
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds with regional high‐grade metamorphism between ~2530 and 2470 Ma [ W. Wang et al ., ], suggesting that the continental crust in the region was finally stabilized (Figure a). The widespread emplacement of late Neoarchean potassic granitoid gneisses is consistent with the tectonic models for the Eastern Block of the North China Craton that was stabilized by the end of the Archean [ Liu et al ., ; Kusky , ; Wan et al ., ; Zhao et al ., ; Kusky et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This corresponds with regional high‐grade metamorphism between ~2530 and 2470 Ma [ W. Wang et al ., ], suggesting that the continental crust in the region was finally stabilized (Figure a). The widespread emplacement of late Neoarchean potassic granitoid gneisses is consistent with the tectonic models for the Eastern Block of the North China Craton that was stabilized by the end of the Archean [ Liu et al ., ; Kusky , ; Wan et al ., ; Zhao et al ., ; Kusky et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhai and Santosh [] divided the Archean crystalline basement of North China Craton into seven blocks (Jiaoliao, Qianhuai, Xuhuai, Xuchang, Jining, Ordos, and Alashan), which were considered to have amalgamated largely along the greenstone belts during the late Archean. Recently, Kusky and coauthors suggested that crustal growth in the North China Craton occurred in a sequential, clockwise direction through the development of a series of sutures at 2.7 Ga, 2.5 Ga, 2.43 Ga, 2.3 Ga, and 1.9 Ga [ Kusky et al ., ]. A major ~2.5 Ga suture zone constitutes the Central Orogenic Belt, which records final end Archean collision between the N‐S trending late Archean Wutai/Fuping arc and the Eastern Block [ Deng et al ., ].…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NCC was stabilized during the late Archean, but subsequently experienced progressive destruction of the lithosphere (decratonization) during the Mesozoic, generating a series of controversies. One of the ongoing debates concerns the age of final cratonization and the appropriate geological model for formation of the NCC (Kusky, ; Kusky & Li, ; Kusky, Li, & Santosh, ; Kusky et al., ; Kröner, Wilde, Li, & Wang, ; Li & Kusky, ; Trap, Faure, Lin, Breton, & Monié, ; Wang, ; Wang et al., ; Yang, Wu, Wilde, Belousova, & Griffin, ; Zhai, ; Zhai, Guo, & Liu, ; Zhang, Luo, Zhou, & Liu, ; Zhao, Sun, Wilde, & Li, ; Zhao et al., , ; Zheng et al., ). An early model, based on lithological, structural, metamorphic and geochronological data, subdivided the Precambrian basement of the NCC into Eastern and Western Blocks separated by the TNCO (Zhao, Cawood, Wilde, Min, & Lu, ; Zhao, Wilde, Cawood, & Lu, , ; Zhao et al., ), but other models have also been proposed (Kusky et al., , ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Zanhuang Massif/Complex, with good exposures of TTG, supracrustal successions, and potassic granitoids (HBGMR, ; Yang et al, , ), is located in the eastern‐most margin of the central section of the Central Orogenic Belt (COB) or Trans‐North China Craton (TNCO; Figure c; e.g., Zhao et al, ). Recent studies imply that parts of it belong to the Eastern Block of the NCC (Trap et al, ; Trap, Faure, Lin, Breton, & Monié, ), while other parts belong to the TNCO or the Central Orogenic Belt (Kusky et al, ; Wang et al, ; Wang, Kusky, et al, ) or the Fuping Block (Trap et al, , Trap et al, ). Therefore, it is a key area to clarify the structural and age relationships of the early convergent and collisional orogenesis between the eastern block and the western block and any intervening arc or accretionary terranes (Trap et al, ; Wang et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%