2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into toxicity of polychlorinated naphthalenes to multiple human endocrine receptors: Mechanism and health risk analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular-dynamics simulations were used to characterize the magnitude of toxicity of TPs in various environmental media. Binding-energy values for the neurological, developmental, and reproductive toxicity of NR, SBR, IIR, NBR, and NBR (and the additive components commonly used) to organisms in marine, freshwater, and soil environments were calculated [ 75 , 76 ]. For this purpose, we used molecular-dynamics simulations ( Table 3 ) (the higher the absolute value of the toxicity in the table, the higher the toxicity of rubber to the organisms).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular-dynamics simulations were used to characterize the magnitude of toxicity of TPs in various environmental media. Binding-energy values for the neurological, developmental, and reproductive toxicity of NR, SBR, IIR, NBR, and NBR (and the additive components commonly used) to organisms in marine, freshwater, and soil environments were calculated [ 75 , 76 ]. For this purpose, we used molecular-dynamics simulations ( Table 3 ) (the higher the absolute value of the toxicity in the table, the higher the toxicity of rubber to the organisms).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular docking is a common method for analyzing receptor characteristics and the mode of interaction between receptors and ligands, and plays an important role in the study of the binding capacity of small molecular compounds and biomolecules [ 37 ]. A larger value of LibDock score indicates a stronger binding interaction between the ligand and the receptor [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, R2, standard deviation SEE, and test value F were calculated, and the training set that met the model requirements was used for the test set prediction. The r 2 pred (>0.6) that met the model requirements was determined, and the construction of the CoMSIA model was completed [ 37 , 46 ]. The CoMSIA model contained an electrostatic field (E), steric field (S), hydrophobic field (H), donor field (D), and an acceptor field (A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the electronic parameters of ligand PAEs, Q + , QH + , and E LUMO (the lowest occupied orbital energy) represent the electron gain and loss ability of PAEs. The binding of PAEs to hormone proteins to form a complex and the subsequent binding of the complex to DNA response elements can affect the hydrogen bonds and the electrostatic or polar interactions between them [42]. With the increase in Q + and QH + , it is easier to form hydrogen bonds (HB) and VDW forces between ligands and receptors [43].…”
Section: Identification and Analysis Of The Key Eigenvalues Of The Ao...mentioning
confidence: 99%