Insights on Bloom Forming Jellyfish (Class: Scyphozoa) in the Gulf of Mexico: Environmental Tolerance Ranges and Limits Suggest Differences in Habitat Preference and Resistance to Climate Change Among Congeners

Frolova, Anna V.; Miglietta, Maria Pia

doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00093

Cited by 17 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 62 publications

(83 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…9 Dawson, Gupta & England, 2005 . Ki et al, 2008 ; Ramšak, Stopar & Malej, 2012 ; Dong, Liu & Liu, 2015 ; He et al, 2015 ; Chiaverano, Bayha & Graham, 2016 ; Scorrano et al, 2016 ; Chiaverano & Graham, 2017 ; Gómez-Daglio & Dawson, 2017 ; Abboud, Gómez-Daglio & Dawson, 2018 ; Dong, 2018 , Frolova & Miglietta, 2020 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The importance of molecular characters when morphological variability hinders diagnosability: systematics of the moon jellyfish genusAurelia(Cnidaria: Scyphozoa)

Lawley

Gamero‐Mora

Maronna

et al. 2021

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cryptic species have been detected across Metazoa, and while no apparent morphological features distinguish them, it should not impede taxonomists from formal descriptions. We accepted this challenge for the jellyfish genus Aurelia, which has a long and confusing taxonomic history. We demonstrate that morphological variability in Aurelia medusae overlaps across very distant geographic localities. Even though some morphological features seem responsible for most of the variation, regional geographic patterns of dissimilarities are lacking. This is further emphasized by morphological differences found when comparing lab-cultured Aurelia coerulea medusae with the diagnostic features in its recent redescription. Previous studies have also highlighted the difficulties in distinguishing Aurelia polyps and ephyrae, and their morphological plasticity. Therefore, mostly based on genetic data, we recognize 28 species of Aurelia, of which seven were already described, 10 are formally described herein, four are resurrected and seven remain undescribed. We present diagnostic genetic characters for all species and designate type materials for newly described and some resurrected species. Recognizing moon jellyfish diversity with formal names is vital for conservation efforts and other studies. This work clarifies the practical implications of molecular genetic data as diagnostic characters, and sheds light on the patterns and processes that generate crypsis.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The importance of molecular characters when morphological variability hinders diagnosability: systematics of the moon jellyfish genusAurelia(Cnidaria: Scyphozoa)

Lawley

Gamero‐Mora

Maronna

et al. 2021

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…"sp. 18", which is only known in the Gulf of Mexico [57]. The COI sequence divergence (p-distance) is ca.…”

Section: Phylogenetic Position Of Aurelia "Misteriosa"mentioning

confidence: 99%

DNA Barcoding of Moon Jellyfish (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa, Ulmaridae, Aurelia): Two Cryptic Species from the Azores (NE Atlantic, Macaronesia), and Evaluation of the Non-Indigenous Species (NIS)

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Moon jellies are some of the most popular, widely distributed, and best-studied marine jellyfish. By the end of the past century only two or three Aurelia species were recognized, but with the rise of DNA barcoding studies, around thirty Aurelia species are presently accepted. Most of the species are morphologically indistinguishable and have restricted biogeography. We reveal, with COI, 16S, and ITS1-5.8S sequence data, two (pseudo-)cryptic species of Aurelia, potentially endemic to the Azores ecoregion, herein provisionally classified as A. “cf. pseudosolida” and A. “misteriosa”. These species are closely related to the Mediterranean lineages of A. pseudosolida and A. persea, respectively. In the Azores, the shape of the campanula and oral arms readily distinguishes the two species: the former with folded oral arms and globose campanula, and the latter with flattened campanula and thick and long oral arms. Previous reports of A. solida and A. aurita in the Azores should generally correspond to A. “misteriosa” and A. cf. pseudosolida, respectively. The phylogenetic (re-)examination of the available DNA barcodes of Aurelia only evidenced human-mediated dispersal for A. coerulea, A. relicta, and A. aurita. Aurelia solida cannot be yet considered NIS in the Mediterranean. More jellyfish DNA (meta)barcoding should reveal further cryptic diversity, biological invasions, and phylogeographic inferences.

show abstract

“…Chrysaora melanaster, C. capillata, Staurophora mertensii as well as Aequorea and Aurelia species are common in the Northern Pacific, for example (Cieciel and Yasumiishi, 2017), whereas species such as Chrysaora lactea, Aurelia and Stomolophus species are common off the coast of South America (Oliviera et al, 2016;Frolova and Miglietta, 2020) including Chile, where salmonid aquaculture is also an important industry. The majority of existing research is focused on bloom-forming and biofouling jellyfish species of the Northern Atlantic, however that does not mean those of other geographical areas are harmless to fish.…”

Section: Distribution and Reporting Of Cnidarian Jellyfishmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacts of jellyfish on marine cage aquaculture: an overview of existing knowledge and the challenges to finfish health

Clinton

Ferrier

Martín

et al. 2021

ICES Journal of Marine Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gelatinous plankton present a challenge to marine fish aquaculture that remains to be addressed. Shifting plankton distributions, suggested by some to be a result of factors such as climate change and overfishing, appear to be exacerbated by anthropogenic factors linked directly to aquaculture. Fish health can be negatively influenced by exposure to the cnidarian hydrozoan and scyphozoan life stages commonly referred to as “jellyfish”. Impact is particularly pronounced in gill tissue, where three key outcomes of exposure are described; direct traumatic damage, impaired function, and initiation of secondary disease. Cnidarian jellyfish demonstrated to negatively impact fish include Cyanea capillata, Aurelia aurita, and Pelagia noctiluca. Further coelenterates have also been associated with harm to fish, including sessile polyps of species such as Ectopleura larynx. An accurate picture of inshore planktic exposure densities within the coastal environments of aquaculture would aid in understanding cnidarian species of concern, and their impact upon fish health, particularly in gill disease. This information is however presently lacking. This review summarises the available literature regarding the impact of gelatinous plankton on finfish aquaculture, with a focus on cnidarian impact on fish health. Present strategies in monitoring and mitigation are presented, alongside identified critical knowledge gaps.

show abstract

Insights on Bloom Forming Jellyfish (Class: Scyphozoa) in the Gulf of Mexico: Environmental Tolerance Ranges and Limits Suggest Differences in Habitat Preference and Resistance to Climate Change Among Congeners

Cited by 17 publications

References 62 publications

The importance of molecular characters when morphological variability hinders diagnosability: systematics of the moon jellyfish genusAurelia(Cnidaria: Scyphozoa)

The importance of molecular characters when morphological variability hinders diagnosability: systematics of the moon jellyfish genusAurelia(Cnidaria: Scyphozoa)

DNA Barcoding of Moon Jellyfish (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa, Ulmaridae, Aurelia): Two Cryptic Species from the Azores (NE Atlantic, Macaronesia), and Evaluation of the Non-Indigenous Species (NIS)

Impacts of jellyfish on marine cage aquaculture: an overview of existing knowledge and the challenges to finfish health

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About