2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-011-0106-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights on PRAME and osteosarcoma by means of gene expression profiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of the cell lines showed simultaneously gain and two additional cell lines showed gain and over-expression. PRAME was also over-expressed in 12/29 osteosarcoma clinical samples based on identical types of microarray data (no methylation data was available) [27], and has also recently been shown by others to be over-expressed in osteosarcomas [40], [41]. Hypo-methylation of PRAME has been demonstrated to be responsible for the increased expression in various types of cancer [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Four of the cell lines showed simultaneously gain and two additional cell lines showed gain and over-expression. PRAME was also over-expressed in 12/29 osteosarcoma clinical samples based on identical types of microarray data (no methylation data was available) [27], and has also recently been shown by others to be over-expressed in osteosarcomas [40], [41]. Hypo-methylation of PRAME has been demonstrated to be responsible for the increased expression in various types of cancer [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The second point shows as, although a diffuse positivity for PRAME (4+) could reasonably favor a diagnosis of M in the appropriate clinical set, rare cases of M and MM could be negative for PRAME (patient #15), as well as other tumors (sarcomas, carcinomas of the female genital tracts, leukemias and germ cell tumors) could be positive for PRAME. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] In this context, DS showing positivity for both PRAME and melanocytic markers (Melan A and HMB45) strongly encourages a diagnosis of M, especially on small/incisional biopsies with the risk that material could be consumed on serial sections. Last, DS showed more intense staining for HMB45 rather than Melan A, with Melan A being more intense in SS rather than in DS (Table 2, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three of them are target antigens overexpressed on tumor cells. 33 , 34 , 35 Of the 15 patients who were included in the study, 73% were defined as responders. Furthermore, 5 of the 7 WT patients who received the infusions were defined as responders.…”
Section: Immune Cell Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%