2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights on the role of interparticle porosity and electrode thickness on capacitive deionization performance for desalination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, micropores determined the adsorption capacity, and the reduction of micropores was expected to lower the adsorption property. 40 However, the surface coated PANI is likely to switch the hydrophobic carbon surface to be hydrophilic and thus accelerate the diffusion of ions in the pore channels. In addition, the conjugated backbone structure of PANI had higher charge density than AC, 34 which would change the ion−surface interaction at the solid−liquid interface and thus affect the ion adsorption behavior.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, micropores determined the adsorption capacity, and the reduction of micropores was expected to lower the adsorption property. 40 However, the surface coated PANI is likely to switch the hydrophobic carbon surface to be hydrophilic and thus accelerate the diffusion of ions in the pore channels. In addition, the conjugated backbone structure of PANI had higher charge density than AC, 34 which would change the ion−surface interaction at the solid−liquid interface and thus affect the ion adsorption behavior.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, polydopamine modification of ion exchange membranes showed decrement in electrosorption performance, which was attributed to inhibition of ion transportation without changing the hydrophilicity. In another study, the electrode preparation techniques were compared with respect to electrosorption performance (Barcelos et al, 2020). Two different techniques, blade-casting (DB) and free-standing (FS) were used to prepare the electrodes, which affected the thickness, interparticle porosity and hydrophilicity of the electrodes as shown in Figure 41a.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Electrosorption Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“… normalSgoodbreak=SREnormaliSREnormalj ρgoodbreak=ci,inci,fci,italicincj,incj,fcj,italicin Si/jgoodbreak=0t)(ci,italicinfgoodbreak−ci,italiceff0.25emitalicdt/ci,italicinf0t)(cj,italicinfgoodbreak−cj,italiceff0.25emitalicdt/cj,italicinf The coulombic efficiency (CoE) is calculated in flow‐electrode capacitive deionization (FCDI) architecture and is represented in Equation () (Srimuk, Su, et al, 2020). italicCoEgoodbreak=QitalicdischargeQitaliccharge The energy consumption (E cons ) is calculated by Equation () (Barcelos et al, 2020). Econsgoodbreak=EcellI.italicdtmitalicrem …”
Section: Electrosorption Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the SAC V is oen more valuable for CDI application than simply pursuing gravimetric desalination capacity (SAC G ). 1,[16][17][18] Therefore, it is imperative to reasonably design the structure and morphology of carbon electrode materials to enhance their SAC V .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%