2013
DOI: 10.1002/grl.50211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insignificant solar‐terrestrial triggering of earthquakes

Abstract: [1] We examine the claim that solar-terrestrial interaction, as measured by sunspots, solar wind velocity, and geomagnetic activity, might play a role in triggering earthquakes. We count the number of earthquakes having magnitudes that exceed chosen thresholds in calendar years, months, and days, and we order these counts by the corresponding rank of annual, monthly, and daily averages of the solar-terrestrial variables. We measure the statistical significance of the difference between the earthquake-number di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that most investigations of magnetism and earthquakes have not been conclusive because of the use of magnetic records that are heavily governed by the external conditions of the ionosphere, making the results meaningless in the geodynamic context (Thomas et al, 2009;Love and Thomas, 2013;Masci and Thomas, 2015). Despite this, there is a great amount of recent and rigorous research that has shown a statistical relation between magnetism and earthquakes, and thus, this effect could not be negligible in other magnetic properties, such as the Rc or the study of particle flux at Earth's ground level (Hayakawa et al, 2015;Contoyiannis et al, 2016;Potirakis et al, 2016a, b;De Santis et al, 2017;Oikonomou et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that most investigations of magnetism and earthquakes have not been conclusive because of the use of magnetic records that are heavily governed by the external conditions of the ionosphere, making the results meaningless in the geodynamic context (Thomas et al, 2009;Love and Thomas, 2013;Masci and Thomas, 2015). Despite this, there is a great amount of recent and rigorous research that has shown a statistical relation between magnetism and earthquakes, and thus, this effect could not be negligible in other magnetic properties, such as the Rc or the study of particle flux at Earth's ground level (Hayakawa et al, 2015;Contoyiannis et al, 2016;Potirakis et al, 2016a, b;De Santis et al, 2017;Oikonomou et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signals identified as possibly precursory might have alternative causes that are unrelated to the earthquake process. Thus, when examining reports of earthquake precursors, it is important to determine if effects similar to the possible precursors are also observed during earthquakes (Park et al, 1993). Since the major energy is released during the earthquake, and not before the earthquake, if co-seismic changes do not occur, it is unlikely that the cloud formations have any physical relationship with the earthquake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great majority of studies of the magnetic field and seismic events have been carried out relating temporal variations in the geomagnetic field with frequencies which are comparable to variations in the ionosphere, the space medium and human activity (0.01 − 10 ). Besides, they have required specific chemical and geological conditions in fault zones, which restrains the arguments of such studies as they cannot establish any sort of causal mechanism [Thomas et al, 2009a, Thomas et al, 2009b, Thomas et al, 2012, Love and Thomas, 2013, Scoville et al, 2015. We used the first and second derivatives of the component in the Putre and Ester Island (IPM) station magnetometers, which have not been thoroughly investigated.…”
Section: Observatories Of Geomagnetic Data and Magneto-seismic Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%