2012
DOI: 10.1177/0312896211428494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insolvency administration as a strategic response to financial distress

Abstract: This study considers whether the strategic decision to enter voluntary administration (VA) rather than to trade the company’s business for a protracted period of declining performance is systematically related to the effective monitoring of management decision-making. Analysis that tests the association between strategic entry into VA and the likelihood that a company will reorganize in VA is also presented. We find about half of the companies in our sample entered VA as a strategic choice. The likelihood of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 While other statistical models analyse an event’s probability using variables based on data at one time point (e.g. logistic regression), survival analysis accommodate changes in the probability of the event due to changes in the values of variables over time (Routledge and Morrison, 2012). That is, it provides the probability that financial distress will occur at a time T that lies beyond the time horizon t , for a range of values of t .…”
Section: Advances In Bankruptcy Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 While other statistical models analyse an event’s probability using variables based on data at one time point (e.g. logistic regression), survival analysis accommodate changes in the probability of the event due to changes in the values of variables over time (Routledge and Morrison, 2012). That is, it provides the probability that financial distress will occur at a time T that lies beyond the time horizon t , for a range of values of t .…”
Section: Advances In Bankruptcy Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior Australian evidence on corporate decline has focused on examining factors discriminating between failing (bankruptcy) and non-failing firms. This includes studies by Castagna and Matolcsy (1981), Crapp and Stevenson (1987), Izan (1984), Kim and Partington (2014) and Yim and Mitchell (2007) developing corporate failure prediction models, and Al-Hadi et al (2017), Chapple and Routledge (2018), Magee (2012), Miglani et al (2015), Routledge and Gadenne (2000) and Routledge and Morrison (2012) which relate corporate governance attributes and other corporate decision-making with financial distress or voluntary administration outcomes. While predicting or identifying firm failure or termination is important, particularly from the perspective of shareholders, it is arguably more useful if intervention action or influences can be identified prior to the ultimate failure stage being reached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(); Nartea et al . (), Bugeja and Sinelnikov (); Jian and Xu (); Routledge and Morrison (); Nguyen and Rahman ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%