2015
DOI: 10.1117/1.jei.24.6.061118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inspection of aeronautical mechanical parts with a pan-tilt-zoom camera: an approach guided by the computer-aided design model

Abstract: International audienceWe focus on quality control of mechanical parts in aeronautical context using a single pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) camera and a computer-aided design (CAD) model of the mechanical part. We use the CAD model to create a theoretical image of the element to be checked, which is further matched with the sensed image of the element to be inspected, using a graph theory–based approach. The matching is carried out in two stages. First, the two images are used to create two attributed graphs representing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jovancevic et al [ 15 ] show that utilizing CAD model whenever possible is beneficial for their results in the task of exterior aircraft inspection. Viana et al [ 16 ] have presented a CAD-based inspection of mechanical parts by means of comparison between a reference and a test image. The CAD-based matching method compares an image generated from a CAD model with an image acquired with the 2D camera, using primitives extracted from the contours.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jovancevic et al [ 15 ] show that utilizing CAD model whenever possible is beneficial for their results in the task of exterior aircraft inspection. Viana et al [ 16 ] have presented a CAD-based inspection of mechanical parts by means of comparison between a reference and a test image. The CAD-based matching method compares an image generated from a CAD model with an image acquired with the 2D camera, using primitives extracted from the contours.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the existing methods for assembly/CAD conformity check are based on comparison of rendered synthetic images with real images [ 16 , 17 ]. Those images are further compared in terms of their respective sets of extracted geometrical primitives such as lines and circles/ellipses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensities of both the input and transformation matrices are compared using a similarity measure (e.g. a mean square metric as in the presented study) with the aim to maximize the similarity between both matrices (Viana et al, 2015). The iterative optimization process continues until the maximum iteration criterion reaches 1000 iterations, or the optimization criterion reaches a maximum step length of 0.01.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the periodicity analysis we use an autocorrelation function, which measures the self-similarity of a signal (Tzanetakis and Cook, 2002). If discharge occurs regularly, it causes a periodic signal, which is expressed as a significant peak (above or below 95 % confidence interval) in the autocorrelation function.…”
Section: Spatio-temporal Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defect inspection using a Computer Aided Design (CAD) model has also been actively researched. Viana et al [11] used a CAD model to generate a theoretical image of the inspected object, which was further matched with the sensed image acquired with a 2D camera. Berndt et al [12] introduced the digital comparison of assembled products with CAD data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%