2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-015-2410-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instabilities of Extremal Rotating Black Holes in Higher Dimensions

Abstract: May 1, 2015Recently, Durkee and Reall have conjectured a criterion for linear instability of rotating, extremal, asymptotically Minkowskian black holes in d ≥ 4 dimensions, such as the Myers-Perry black holes. They considered a certain elliptic operator, A , acting on symmetric trace-free tensors intrinsic to the horizon. Based in part on numerical evidence, they suggested that if the lowest eigenvalue of this operator is less than the critical value −1/4 ( called "effective BF-bound"), then the black hole is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(320 reference statements)
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis also applies to axisymmetric electromagnetic perturbations with compact support initial data on stationary-axisymmetric (asymptotically flat or deSitter) extremal black hole backgrounds. In particular, our results imply that the criterion for instability, in terms of violating the near-horizon "effective Breitenlöhner-Freedman bound", given in Sec.5.2 and 6.4 [25] is never satisfied for axisymmetric electromagnetic perturbations, in agreement with the numerical evidence in Sec.III.E [26].…”
Section: Positivity Of E For Axisymmetric Perturbationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our analysis also applies to axisymmetric electromagnetic perturbations with compact support initial data on stationary-axisymmetric (asymptotically flat or deSitter) extremal black hole backgrounds. In particular, our results imply that the criterion for instability, in terms of violating the near-horizon "effective Breitenlöhner-Freedman bound", given in Sec.5.2 and 6.4 [25] is never satisfied for axisymmetric electromagnetic perturbations, in agreement with the numerical evidence in Sec.III.E [26].…”
Section: Positivity Of E For Axisymmetric Perturbationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We treat electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations using the Hertz potential formalism [36,[40][41][42][43][44]. We choose any stationary, axisymmetric null basis for spacetime that reduces to Eqs.…”
Section: E Electromagnetic and Gravitational Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we can effectively expand 15 Note that since Y ⊂ X , this and the previous set inclusion can hold only if equality holds. 16 Prop. 3.1 was proven for smooth γ, whereas, a priori, the γ appearing in Eq.…”
Section: Generation Of Metric Perturbations By Hertz Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%