2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/ac47d7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instability and turbulent relaxation in a stochastic magnetic field

Abstract: An analysis of instability dynamics in a stochastic magnetic field is presented for the tractable case of the resistive interchange. Externally prescribed static magnetic perturbations convert the eigenmode problem to a stochastic differential equation, which is solved by the method of averaging. The dynamics are rendered multi-scale, due to the size disparity between the test mode and magnetic perturbations. Maintaining quasi-neutrality at all orders requires that small-scale convective cell turbulence be drive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(69 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…q is safety factor, β is plasma beta defined as the ratio of plasma kinetic pressure to magnetic pressure, ϵ is inverse aspect ratio and δB r is a radial magnetic field perturbation. This is in accordance with recent theory and simulations that stochastic fields reduce the linear growth rate of turbulence [48,61,62]. The modulational growth coefficient of the zonal flow is modified as…”
Section: Scaling With Stochastic Fieldssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…q is safety factor, β is plasma beta defined as the ratio of plasma kinetic pressure to magnetic pressure, ϵ is inverse aspect ratio and δB r is a radial magnetic field perturbation. This is in accordance with recent theory and simulations that stochastic fields reduce the linear growth rate of turbulence [48,61,62]. The modulational growth coefficient of the zonal flow is modified as…”
Section: Scaling With Stochastic Fieldssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It can be observed that inside the braces of the scaling of ν T , there are two terms labeled as 'old' and 'new' respectively. If only the 'old' term is retained, the scaling of ν T reverts to that given by equation (38) in [10]. In this study, due to the changes in the mode structure and the spatial scaling ordering, both bx and by enter the calculation of the scaling of ν T .…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…must be satisfied for arbitrary k 1 , which is clearly impossible. This brings us back to the narrative we developed in our previous study on resistive interchange modes in a stochastic magnetic field [10], i.e. small-scale convective cells must be driven by the beat of stochastic magnetic field with quasimode, which further generate a current density fluctuation J⊥ so as to keep ∇ • ( J∥ + J⊥ ) = 0.…”
Section: Generation Of the Microturbulencementioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the present analysis, one can also understand this damping as the fact that in the island topology, ZFs are not energetically favored due to field-line bending, hence the turbulence preferentially drives the island vortex-flow. Another possible explanation is the effect of stochastic magnetic perturbations [33], not taken into account here. Wilcox et al [12] showed that during ELM suppression due to RMP, the density profile as calculated by the two-fluid 3D MHD equilibrium shows a helical variation, is consistent with diagnostic measurements seeing a non-axisymmetric intensity of the turbulence, and thus suggests the presence of an island affecting the turbulence, consistent with the theory proposed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%